Laserfiche WebLink
WHEREAS, PROPER NOTICE THAT THE CITIZENS COMMONWEALTH CORP. WOULD MAKE APPLICATION TO THE CITY <br /> <br />COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA TO HAVE THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED STREET CLOSED, <br /> <br />VACATED, AND DISCONTINUED WAS DULY POSTED; AND <br /> <br /> <br />WHEREAS, ALL THE OWNERS ABUTTING SAID STREET HAVE REQUESTED THE SAID STREET BE CLOSED; AND <br /> <br /> <br />WHEREAS, APPLICATION WAS MADE TO THE CITY COUNCIL AND, PURSUANT TO THE STATUTES IN SUCH CASES <br /> <br /> MADE AND PROVIDED, THE COUNCIL APPOINTED VIEWERS WHO HAVE REPORTED TO THE COUNCIL THAT NO <br /> <br /> INCONVENIENCE TO THE PUBLIC OR TO PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS WOULD RESULT FROM SUCH CLOSING, VACATING <br /> <br />AND DISCONTINUANCE; AND <br /> <br /> <br />WHEREAS, IT IS THE JUDGMENT OF THE COUNCIL THAT SAID STREET SHOULD BE CLOSED, VACATED AND DISCONTINUED. <br /> <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA: <br /> <br /> <br />THAT THE SAID STREET LOCATED IN THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS, <br /> <br /> IS HEREBY CLOSED, VACATED AND DISCONTINUED AS A PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE OF THE CITY OF <br /> <br />CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA, SAID STREET NOT BEING NEEDED FOR PUBLIC USE AND TRAVEL: <br /> <br />IRVING STREET IN THE VINEGAR HILL REDEVELOPMENT AREA. <br /> <br /> <br />ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL <br />JANUARY 6, 1975 <br />AYES: MR. BARBOUR, MR. FIFE, MRS. RINEHART AND MR. VAN YAHRES. <br />NOES: NONE. ABSTAINED: MR. GILLIAM <br /> <br /> <br />AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN SECTION 22.1-12 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, 1965, <br /> <br />AS AMENDED, RELATING TO REVOCATION OF CERTIFICATES OF PLUMBING PROFICIENCY. <br /> <br /> <br />BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE: <br /> <br />(1) THAT §22.1-12 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE IS AMENDED AND REORDAINED AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />SECTION 22.1-12. CERTIFICATE OF PROFICIENCY. <br /> <br />(A) APPLICATION; EXAMINATION; CERTIFICATE PREREQUISITE TO LICENSE; EXPIRATION OF CERTIFICATE ISSUED <br /> <br /> TO REPRESENTATIVE OF FIRM OR CORPORATION. EVERY PERSON DESIRING TO ENTER THE FIELD OF PLUMBING <br /> <br />WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND OTHER ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS <br /> <br /> CONCERNING PLUMBING IN THE CITY SHALL GIVE NOTICE OF SUCH FACT IN WRITING TO THE PLUMBING INSPECTOR. <br /> <br /> SUCH PERSON SHALL BE A MASTER PLUMBER OR EMPLOY A MASTER PLUMBER IN GOOD STANDING AT THE TIME OF <br /> <br />SUCH NOTICE. AFTER THIS NOTICE, THE PLUMBING BOARD SHALL ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF PROFICIENCY WHICH SHALL <br /> <br /> ENTITLE SUCH PERSON TO OBTAIN FROM THE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE A LICENSE TO ENGAGE IN THE BUSINESS <br /> <br /> OF PLUMBING CONTRACTOR IN THE CITY, UPON PAYMENT OF THE LICENSE TAX PRESCRIBED BY LAW THEREFOR. <br /> <br />EVERY SUCH CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO A FIRM OR CORPORATION SHALL BE VALID AS LONG AS THE INDIVIDUAL HOLDING <br /> <br />A VALID MASTER PLUMBER'S REGISTRATION CARD, WHO APPLIED THEREFOR ON BEHALF OF SUCH FIRM OR CORPORATION, <br /> <br />IS IN THE EMPLOY OR ACTIVELY ENGAGED IN SUCH BUSINESS, SUCH CERTIFICATE SHALL FORTHWITH BECOME NULL AND <br /> <br /> VOID AND SUCH FIRM OR CORPORATION SHALL NOT BE AUTHORIZED TO ENGAGE IN SUCH BUSINESS UNTIL SOME OTHER <br /> <br /> INDIVIDUAL OF SUCH FIRM OR CORPORATION CONFORMS TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION; PROVIDED HOWEVER <br /> <br /> THAT THE SUPERINTENDENT OF INSPECTIONS MAY PERMIT SUCH FIRM OR CORPORATION TO CONTINUE TO ENGAGE IN <br /> <br /> BUSINESS FOR A PERIOD OF UP TO NINETY (90) DAYS. <br /> <br /> <br />(B) NONTRANSFERABLE; DURATION. CERTIFICATES ISSUED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION SHALL <br /> <br /> NOT BE TRANSFERABLE AND SHALL CONTINUE IN FORCE AS LONG AS SUCH PERSONS ARE ENGAGED IN THE <br /> <br />BUSINESS OF A PLUMBING CONTRACTOR OR AS LONG AS SUCH DULY ACCREDITED MASTER PLUMBER IS EMPLOYED <br /> <br />BY OR ACTIVELY ENGAGED IN <br /> <br />