Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL CHAMBER - AUGUST 6, 1951 <br />THE COUNCIL MET 1N REGULAR SESSION ON THIS DATE WITH THE <br />FOLLOWING MEMBERS PRESENT: MR. BARR V MR. HADEN, MR. HAMM, MR. HILL <br />AND MR. TEBELL. ABSENT: NONE. <br />THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF JULY 1E, 1951 WERE READ AND <br />APPROVED. <br />A COMMUNICATION FROM MR. HENRY S. HAIGHT, 955 LOCUST AVENUE, <br />PROTESTING THE PROPOSED RE -ROUT 1 NG OF THE LOCUST AVENUE BUS IN THE <br />DOWNTOWN AREA, WAS PRESENTED. THERE WAS ALSO PRESENTED A COPY OF <br />COMMUNICATION RE: PROTEST <br />CHANGE IN BUS ROUTE A LETTER FROM THE CHARLOTTESVILLE AND ALBEMARLE ESUS COMPANY TO MR. <br />HAIGHT WHICH EXPLAINED THE ROUTE THE LOCUST AVENUE BUS WOULD FOLLOW <br />IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA, THEREBY CLARIFYING A MISUNDERSTANDING THAT <br />MCGUFFEY SCHOOL PUPILS USING THIS LINE WOULD FIND IT NECESSARY TO <br />CROSS MAIN STREET AFTER SCHOOL HOURS TO CATCH A BUS HOME. <br />MR. C. A. PAXSON, ATTORNEY, ADDRESSED THE COUNCIL ON BEHALF OF <br />CERTAIN TAXI OPERATORS WITH RESPECT TO THE DISSOLUTION OF THE TAXI <br />REQUEST FOR CHANGE STAND IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA. HE STATED THAT THE PRESENT LOCATION <br />IN LOCATION OF <br />TAXI STAND. <br />ON THIRD STREET WAS NOT A SUITABLE LOCATION FOR A TAX! STAND, AND <br />REQUESTED THAT THE COUNCIL GIVE CONSIDERATION TO THE ESTABLISHMENT <br />OF A TAXI ZONE ON SECOND STREET EAST, SOUTH OF MAIN STREET, A <br />LOCATION WHICH WAS DEEMED MORE SUITABLE FOR THE PURPOSE. ON MOTION <br />THIS MATTER WAS REFERRED TO THE CITY MANAGER FOR STUDY AND RECOMMEN- <br />D AT ION. <br />AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING <br />SECTION 23 (B) OF CHAPTER 7 OF THE CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY CODE OF <br />ORDINANCE ADOPTED RE: 1945", WAS OFFERED BY MR. BARR, SECONDED BY MR. TEBELL, READ, AND <br />CH. 7, SEC. 23(B). <br />UPON THE RULES BE 1 NG SUSPENDED AS TO THE SECOND READING BY UNANIMOUS <br />VOTE, WAS ADOPTED BY THE FCLLOVING RECORDED VOTE: AYES: MR. BARR, <br />MR. HADEN, MR. HAMM, BAR. HILL AND MR. TEBELL, NOES: NONE. <br />THE CITY MANAGER PRESENTED A COMMUNICATION FROM CERTAIN <br />RESIDENTS OF JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE REQUESTING THAT THE 2500 BLOCK <br />REQUEST FOR THROUGH THE 2500 BLOCK OF THAT STREET BE RESURFACED. HE ADVISED <br />RESURFACING PART <br />JEFF. PK. AVE. THAT THE SECTION OF JEFFERSON PARK AVENUE REFERRED TO IN THE <br />PETITION WAS ON THE SCHEDULE OF STREETS TO BE SURFACE TREATED <br />THIS YEAR, BUT DUE TO THE NARROWNESS OF THE STREET IN THIS AREA, IT <br />COULD ONLY BE PAVED TO ITS PRESENT EXISTING WIDTH. <br />A COMMUNICATION FROM THE CLEAR -VIEW TELEVISION CORPORATION, <br />PHILADELPHIA, PA., WITH RESPECT TO THE INSTALLATION OF A COMMUNITY <br />COMMUNICATION RE: ANTENNA TELEVISION SYSTEM IN THE CITY WAS PRESENTED. ON MOTION THE <br />COMMUNITY ANTENNA <br />TELEVISION SYSTEM CITY MANAGER WAS INSTRUCTED TO CONTACT THE ABOVE CONCERN AND <br />REQUEST THAT A REPRESENTATIVE MEET WITH THE COUNCIL TO DISCUSS THE <br />MATTER AS OUTLINED IN THEIR COMMUNICATION• <br />ON MOTION THE FOLLOWING REPORT WAS UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED: <br />AUGUST 2, 1951 <br />- TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL <br />CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA <br />GENTLEMEN: <br />WE HAVE INVESTIGATED THE PETITION REQUESTING THAT THE <br />14 <br />