|
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
<br />CHARLOTTESVILLE THAT FIELD ROAD BE AND THE SAME IS
<br />RESOLUTION ACCEPTING HEREBY ACCEPTED INTO THE CITY STREET SYSTEM IN
<br />FIELD RD. INTO CITY
<br />STREET SYSTEM ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE STREET
<br />COMMITTEE.
<br />A COMMUNICATION REQUESTING THE ACCEPTANCE OF LEWIS MOUNTAIN CIRCLE
<br />INTO THE CITY STREET SYSTEM WAS PRESENTED. THE STREET COMMITTEE ADVISED
<br />COMMUNICATION RE: THAT THIS STREET HAD BEEN CONSTRUCTED TO CONFORM TO CITY SPECIFICATIONS
<br />LEWIS "L10UN7A 1 N CIRCLE
<br />AND RECOMMENDED ITS ACCEPTANCE. ON MOTION BY MR. TEBELL, SECONDED BY
<br />O MR. HADEN, THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED.
<br />BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
<br />W
<br />CHARLOTTESVILLE THAT LEWIS IM-OUNTA I N CIRCLE BE AND
<br />RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE SAME IS HEREBY ACCEPTED INTO THE CITY STREET
<br />LEWIS MT. CL. INTO
<br />CITY STREET SYSTEM SYSTEM 1 N ACCORDNACE WITH THE RECOtvIMENDAT ION OF
<br />THE STREET COMMITTEE.
<br />ON MOTION BY MR. HADEN, SECONDED BY MR. BARB, THE MAYOR WAS
<br />AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH THE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FOR THE
<br />MAYOR AUTHORIZED CARE OF INDIGENT PATIENTS FOR A SIX MONTHS' PERIOD FROM APRIL 1, 1952
<br />TO EXECUTE HOSPITAL
<br />CONTRACT TO SEPTEMBER 309, 1952 AT A RATE OF $14.90 PER PATIENT DAY.
<br />THE RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING $7,500.00 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING
<br />LOT AT THE CORNER OF MARKET AND 7TH STREETS, EAST, WHICH WAS OFFERED AT
<br />APPROPRIATION
<br />MATTER WAS POSTPONED TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING IN
<br />ORDER TO OBTAIN
<br />PARKING LOT
<br />THE LAST REGULAR, MEETING, WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING RECORDED VOTE:
<br />A COST ESTIMATE FOR DESIGNATING THE PROPOSED ROUTE
<br /># 250 DISTRIBUTION
<br />ROAD AS A LIMITED ACCESS HIGHWAY.
<br />AYES: MR. BARR, MR. HADEN, MR. HAMM, MR. HILL AND MR. TEBELL. NOES: NONE.
<br />A COMMUNICATION REQUESTING THAT FIELD ROAD BE
<br />ACCEPTED INTO THE
<br />ORDINANCE RE:
<br />REQUEST FOR
<br />SEC. 521 CH. 7
<br />'SAFETY ",
<br />CITY STREET SYSTEM WAS PRESENTED. THE CITY MANAGER
<br />ADVISED THAT THIS
<br />ACCEPTANCE OF
<br />BARR, SECONDED BY MR. HADEN, AND UPON BEING READ WAS CARRIED OVER TO
<br />FIELD RD. INTO
<br />A COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY LAUNDRY, INC., REQUESTING AN EXCEPTION
<br />CITY STREET SYSTEM
<br />STREET HAD BEEN GRADED AND STONED ITS FULL WIDTH IN
<br />ACCORDANCE WITH
<br />EXCEPTION TO 101
<br />CITY SPECIFICATIONS, AND THE STREET COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED
<br />ACCEPTANCE
<br />SETBACK FOR CITY
<br />THEIR BUILDING WAS PRESENTED. AFTER CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION AND ON
<br />OF ITS DEDICATION. ON MOTICN BY MR. BARR, SECONDED
<br />BY MR. TEBELL,
<br />THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED:
<br />MOTION DULY MADE AND SECONDED THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY
<br />BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
<br />CHARLOTTESVILLE THAT FIELD ROAD BE AND THE SAME IS
<br />RESOLUTION ACCEPTING HEREBY ACCEPTED INTO THE CITY STREET SYSTEM IN
<br />FIELD RD. INTO CITY
<br />STREET SYSTEM ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE STREET
<br />COMMITTEE.
<br />A COMMUNICATION REQUESTING THE ACCEPTANCE OF LEWIS MOUNTAIN CIRCLE
<br />INTO THE CITY STREET SYSTEM WAS PRESENTED. THE STREET COMMITTEE ADVISED
<br />COMMUNICATION RE: THAT THIS STREET HAD BEEN CONSTRUCTED TO CONFORM TO CITY SPECIFICATIONS
<br />LEWIS "L10UN7A 1 N CIRCLE
<br />AND RECOMMENDED ITS ACCEPTANCE. ON MOTION BY MR. TEBELL, SECONDED BY
<br />O MR. HADEN, THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED.
<br />BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
<br />W
<br />CHARLOTTESVILLE THAT LEWIS IM-OUNTA I N CIRCLE BE AND
<br />RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE SAME IS HEREBY ACCEPTED INTO THE CITY STREET
<br />LEWIS MT. CL. INTO
<br />CITY STREET SYSTEM SYSTEM 1 N ACCORDNACE WITH THE RECOtvIMENDAT ION OF
<br />THE STREET COMMITTEE.
<br />ON MOTION BY MR. HADEN, SECONDED BY MR. BARB, THE MAYOR WAS
<br />AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH THE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FOR THE
<br />MAYOR AUTHORIZED CARE OF INDIGENT PATIENTS FOR A SIX MONTHS' PERIOD FROM APRIL 1, 1952
<br />TO EXECUTE HOSPITAL
<br />CONTRACT TO SEPTEMBER 309, 1952 AT A RATE OF $14.90 PER PATIENT DAY.
<br />THE RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING $7,500.00 FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A PARKING
<br />LOT AT THE CORNER OF MARKET AND 7TH STREETS, EAST, WHICH WAS OFFERED AT
<br />RESOLUTION RE: CHARLOTTESVILLE THAT THE PETITION OF THE CITY LAUNDRY,
<br />DENIAL OF REQUEST
<br />FOR EXCEPTION OF INC. REQUESTING EXCEPTION TO THE 10' SETBACK LINE ON
<br />CITY LAUNDRY, INC.
<br />• 10TH STREET, N. W., BETWEEN PRESTON AND GRADY AVENUES,
<br />BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY DENIED.
<br />APPROPRIATION
<br />PARKING LOT
<br />THE LAST REGULAR, MEETING, WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING RECORDED VOTE:
<br />7TH & MARKET STS.
<br />AYES: MR. BARR, MR. HADEN, MR. HAMM, MR. HILL AND MR. TEBELL. NOES: NONE.
<br />AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED : "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING
<br />ORDINANCE RE:
<br />CHAPTER 7 OF THE CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY CODE OF 1945 BY AMENDING SECTION
<br />SEC. 521 CH. 7
<br />'SAFETY ",
<br />CARRIED OVER
<br />52 OF CHAPTER 7, ENTITLED OF DESIGN' WAS OFFERED BY MR.
<br />BARR, SECONDED BY MR. HADEN, AND UPON BEING READ WAS CARRIED OVER TO
<br />THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING.
<br />A COMMUNICATION FROM THE CITY LAUNDRY, INC., REQUESTING AN EXCEPTION
<br />COMMUNICATION RE:
<br />TO THE 10' SETBACK LINE ON 10TH STREET, N. W. FOR A PROPOSED ADDITION TO
<br />EXCEPTION TO 101
<br />SETBACK FOR CITY
<br />THEIR BUILDING WAS PRESENTED. AFTER CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION AND ON
<br />LAUNDRY DEN I ED
<br />MOTION DULY MADE AND SECONDED THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ADOPTED BY
<br />THE FOLLOWING RECORDED VOTE: AYES: MR. BARR, MR. HAMM, MR. HILL AND
<br />MR. TEBELL. NOES: MR. HADEN.:
<br />BE IT RESOLVED BY THE -COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
<br />RESOLUTION RE: CHARLOTTESVILLE THAT THE PETITION OF THE CITY LAUNDRY,
<br />DENIAL OF REQUEST
<br />FOR EXCEPTION OF INC. REQUESTING EXCEPTION TO THE 10' SETBACK LINE ON
<br />CITY LAUNDRY, INC.
<br />• 10TH STREET, N. W., BETWEEN PRESTON AND GRADY AVENUES,
<br />BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY DENIED.
<br />
|