My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2024_02_222-224 Court Square_BAR
Charlottesville
>
Neighborhood Development
>
Historic Preservation and Design Review
>
Board of Architectural Review
>
BAR Archive
>
BAR Applications
>
C Streets
>
Court Square
>
222-224 Court Square
>
2024_02_222-224 Court Square_BAR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2024 10:36:16 AM
Creation date
8/22/2024 10:36:12 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
22-224 Court Square Feb 2024 (2-15-2024) 2 <br />Discussion and Recommendations <br />It is staff’s opinion that neither of the existing doors are original. While they are old and likely historic, <br />the evidence suggests these are salvaged replacement doors installed sometime in the 1970s or 1980s. <br />It cannot be confirmed, but it is unlikely the existing hardware and hinges date to the early 19th century <br />and therefore unlikely to be original. <br /> <br />Per the Secretary’s Standards, when a historical door is missing and there is no evidence on which to <br />base an accurate recreation, the door may be replaced with a new unit that is compatible with the style <br />and character of the historic building. <br /> <br />Staff recommendation: <br />For an early-19th century, federal style building, a typical door would be a panel door with <br />four or six panels and no glazing. Of the 18 doors on nearby, early- to mid-19th century <br />buildings, 13 have four or six panels, all are raised panels (not flat). (See Attachment D.) <br />While the age and origin of these door is unknown, they do support the recommendation that <br />replacement doors at 222 and 224 Court Square be raised panel with four or six panels. <br />Additionally, the panels should be installed within profiled rails and stiles, not inserted with <br />trim applied to the rails and stiles. <br /> <br />In the event the applicant requests the new doors have glazing in the upper panels—a <br />possibility discussed with staff. The BAR might look to the existing door (actually, double <br />doors) at 100 Court Square [the east elevation of the Farrish Hotel], which feature glazing <br />over a single row of low raised panels. A second option would be a door with four raised <br />panels and two, smaller glazed panels at the top. Essentially, a traditional six-panel door with <br />the top panels glazed. Staff discourages a door with a large single-lite or multiple lites above <br />the lock rail. [From the photos of sample doors, the following would be unacceptable 412 East <br />Jefferson, Number Nothing (on Jefferson St, west entry), and the nine-lite door at 100 Court <br />Square.] <br /> <br /> <br />222 Court Square: Evidence indicates the existing door—--is not original. (See Attachment C.) <br />• The photos on the City’s historical survey [undated] show a door with a half-circle, fan lite. <br />• A report from October 1990 notes “the doors are not part of the original facade: they appear to <br />have been purchased at a salvage yard and used as replacements for deteriorated original doors.” <br />The associated sketch shows the door with a half-circle, fan lite seen in the survey photo. <br /> <br />224 Court Square: Evidence indicates the door at is most likely not original. (See Attachment C.) <br />• A report from October 1990 notes “the doors are not part of the original facade: they appear to <br />have been purchased at a salvage yard and used as replacements for deteriorated original doors.” <br />The associated sketch shows a door similar to the current door. <br />• A sketch from a 1976 BAR request [to replace the wood steps] shows a six-panel door. <br /> <br />A sketch from a 1997 BAR request indicates both doors were to be replaced with antique, four-panel <br />doors; however, that was obviously not done. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.