Laserfiche WebLink
AYES: MR. HAGGERTY, MR. MOUNT, MR. RENNOLDS, <br />MR. RINEHART AND MR. VOGT. <br />NOES: NONE. <br />CLERK PRESIDENT <br />AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 15.1-3 OF <br />CHAPTER 15.1 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, <br />1965, ENTITLED "NOTICE OF VIOLATION". <br />BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE THAT SECTION 15.1-3 OF CHAPTER 15.1 <br />ENTITLED "NOTICE OF VIOLATION" OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, 1965, BE AMENDED AND REENACTED <br />TO READ AS FOLLOWS: <br />SECTION 15.1-3 NOTICE OF VIOLATION <br />WHENEVER THE ENFORCING OFFICER DETERMINES THAT THERE HAS BEEN A VIOLATION OF ANY PROVISION OF THIS <br />CHAPTER, HE SHALL GIVE WRITTEN NOTICE OF EACH VIOLATION TO THE PERSON OR PERSONS RESPONSIBLE THEREFOR <br />AND ORDER COMPLIANCE WITH THIS CHAPTER, AS HEREINAFTER PROVIDED. SUCH NOTICE AND ORDER SHALL: <br />(C) BE SERVED UPON THE OWNER OR OCCUPANT, AS THE CASE MAY REQUIRE; PROVIDED, THAT SUCH NOTICE <br />SHALL BE DEEMED TO BE PROPERLY SERVED UPON SUCH OWNER OR OCCUPANT IF A COPY THEREOF IS SERVED UPON HIM <br />PERSONALLY; OR BY REGISTERED OR CERTIFIED MAIL TO HIS LAST KNOWN ADDRESS SHOWN ON THE LAND BOOKS OF THIS <br />CITY FOR THE YEAR PRECEDING AND BY POSTING IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE ON OR ABOUT THE PREMISES AFFECTED, A <br />COPY OF SUCH NOTICE OR ORDER. IF THE WHEREABOUTS OF SUCH PERSON IS UNKNOWN AND THE SAME CANNOT BE <br />ASCERTAINED BY THE ENFORCING OFFICER IN THE EXERCISE OF REASONABLE DILIGENCE, THE ENFORCING OFFICER SHALL <br />MAKE AFFIDAVIT TO THAT EFFECT AND CAUSE TO BE PUBLISHED IN A NEWSPAPER PUBLISHED IN THIS CITY A COPY OF <br />THE NOTICE ONCE A WEEK FOR TWO CONSECUTIVE WEEKS. <br />ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL <br />.JANUARY 15, 1968 <br />AYES: MR. HAGGERTY, MR. MOUNT, MR. RENNOLDS, <br />MR. RINEHART AND MR. VOGT. <br />NOES: NONE. <br />CLERK v PRESIDENT <br />AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING SECTION 18-98.2 OF <br />CHAPTER 18 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, <br />1965, ENTITLED "SAME -SALE OF T I R ES HAVING CLEATS, ETC., <br />PROHIBITED; EXCEPTIONS . <br />BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE THAT SECTION 18-98.2 OF CHAPTER 18 OF <br />0 THE CODE OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, 1965, ENTITLED "SAME -SALE OF TIRES HAVING CLEATS; ETC., PROHIBITED - <br />EXCEPTIONS" BE AMENDED AND REENACTED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: <br />SECTION 18-98.2. SAME -SALE OF TIRES HAVING CLEATS, ETC., PROHIBITED; EXCEPTIONS. <br />NO PERSON SHALL SELL TO ANY RESIDENT OF THE CITY A TIRE WHICH SHALL HAVE ON ITS PERIPHERY ANY BLOCK, <br />STUD, FLANGE, CLEAT OR SPIKE OR ANY OTHER PROTUBERANCE OF ANY MATERIAL OTHER THAN RUBBER WHICH PROJECTS <br />BEYOND THE TREAD OF THE TRACTION SURFACE OF THE TIRE, EXCEPT THAT FARM MACHINERY HAVING PROTUBERANCES <br />WHICH WILL NOT INJURE THE HIGHWAY AND TIRE CHAINS OF REASONABLE PROPORTIONS MAY BE SOLD; PROVIDED THAT <br />IT SHALL BE PERMISSIBLE TO SELL STUDDED TIRES WITH STUDS WHICH PROJECT NOT MORE THAN ONE -SIXTEENTH OF AN <br />INCH BEYOND THE TREAD OF THE TRACTION SURFACE OF THE TIRE WHEN COMPRESSED AND WHICH COVER NOT MORE THAN <br />THREE PERCENT OF THE TRACTION SURFACE OF THE TIRE. <br />CLERK <br />ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL <br />FEBRUARY 5, 1968 <br />AYES: MR. HAGGERTY, MR. MOUNT, MR. RENNOLDS <br />AND MR. RINEHART. <br />NOES: NONE. (MR. VOGT ABSENT) <br />i <br />PRESIDENT <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />L <br />• <br />