|
2~
<br />AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "APJ ORDINANCE AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SUBSECTION 3
<br />OF SECTION 5 OF CHAPTER 33 of THE CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY CODE OF 1945, AS AMENDED",
<br />ORDINANCE RE:
<br />SUBSEC 3, SEC. ~ WAS OFFERED BY MR. MICHIE, SECONDED BY MR, SCRIBNER, AND UPON THE RULES BEING
<br />ADOPTED
<br />SUSPENDED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING RECORDED VOTE:
<br />AYES: MR. COLEMAN, MR. DAVIS, MR. MICHIE, MR, SCRIBNER AND MR. WEINBERG. NOES: NON
<br />AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SUBSECTION 5
<br />O~as~cNG~,RSEC. 6 OF SECTION 6 OF CHAPTER 33 OF THE CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY CODE OF 1945, AS AMENDED",
<br />CH. 33 ADOPTED.
<br />WAS OFFERED BY MR. MICHIE, SECONDED BY MR. SCRIBNER, AND UPON THE RULES BEING
<br />SUSPENDED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING RECORDED VOTE:
<br />AYES: MR. COLEMAN, MR. DAVIS, MR. MICHIE, MR. SCRIBNER AND MR. WEINBERG. NOES: NONI
<br />,, AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SUBSECTION 7
<br />ORDINANCE RE: sEC. 7, cH. 33 OF SECTION 7 OF CHAPTER 33 OF THE CHARLTTESVILLE CITY CODE OF 1945, AS AMENDED",
<br />SUBSEC. 7 ADOPTED.
<br />WAS OFFERED BY MR. MICHIE, SECONDED BY MR. SCRIBNER, AND UPON THE RULES BEING
<br />SUSPENDED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING RECORDED VOTE:
<br />AYES: MR. COLEMAN, MR, DAVIS, MR. MICHIE, MR. SCRIBNER AND MR. WEINBERG. NOES: NONE
<br />AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND ~'E-ENACTING SECTION 7 OF
<br />ORDINANCE RE: SEC. 7, CH. 33
<br />ADOPTED CHAPTER 33 OF THE CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY CODE OF 1945, AS AMENDED, B'f THE ADDITION
<br />THERETO OF A NEW SUBSECTION NUM8ERED SUBSECTION 8"
<br />WAS OFFERED BY MR. MICHIE, SECONDED BY MR. SCRIBNER, AND UPON THE RULES BEING
<br />SUSPENDED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING RFCORDED VOTE:
<br />AYES: MR. COLEMAN, MR, DAVIS, MR. MICHIE, MR, SCRIBNER AND MR. WEINBERG. NOES: NONE
<br />AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION 121.78,
<br />ORDINANCE ADOPTED RE:
<br />SEC. 121.78 of BUILDING cooF. ENTITLED 'MARQUEES' OF THE BUILDING CODE OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE", was
<br />OFFERED BY MR. MICHIE, SECONDED BY MR, WEINBERG, AND UPON THE RULES BEING
<br />SUSPENDED BY UNANIMOUS VOTE, WAS ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING RECORDED VOTE;
<br />AYES: MR. COLEMAN, MR.DAVIS, MR. MICHIE, MR. SCRIBNER AND MR, WEINBERG. NOES; NONE.
<br />ON MOTION BY MR. MICHIE, SECONDED BY MR, COLEMAN, THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS
<br />OFFERED AND CARRIED OVER TO THE NEXT MEETING FOR CONSIDERATION:
<br />RESOLUTION CARRIED GVER RE:
<br />APPROPR{ATION UTILITIES BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE
<br />JEFF. PK. RD., GRACE ST.,
<br />8c MERRYDEN SUB. THAT `7,192.72 BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY APPROPRIATED FOR THE CITY'S
<br />SHARE OF THE COST OF UTILITIES IN JEFFERSON PARK ROAD, GRACE STREET
<br />AND THE MERRYDEN SUBDIVISIONS.
<br />THE FOLLOWING COMMUNICATION WAS PRESENTED;
<br />MAY 20, 1957
<br />MR. JAMES E. BOWEN, JR.
<br />CITY MANAGER
<br />CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA
<br />DEAR MR. BOWEN:
<br />I WOULD BE GLAD TO UNDERTAKE THE COLLECTION OF CITY DELINQUENT
<br />TAXES ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS:
<br />THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZES ME TO FILE SUIT TO COLLECT
<br />MATTER RE: COLLF_CT10N OF ALL TAXES DUE FOR THE YEAR 1953 AND PRIOR YEARS, AND WHEN SUIT
<br />DELINQUENT TAXES IS FILED FOR ONE OF THESE PRIOR YEARS TO INCLUDE ALL TAXES UP
<br />TO DATE, MY EXPERIENCE IN FILING SU-TS FOR THE COUNTY IS IF YOU
<br />DON'T MAKE THEM PAY UP 70 DATE, ANOTHER YEAR COMES UP VERY SOON
<br />FOR ENFORCEMENT.
<br />THERE WILL BE NO CHARGE FOR ANY WORK UNLESS A COLLECTION IS
<br />MADE. I AM TO RECEIVE FROM THE CITY A FEE EQUAL TO 2O~ OF
<br />THE NET AMOUNT COLLECTED FOR THE CITY IN SUTTS, i WOULD PAY THE
<br />CITY ALL THE TAXES DUE AND THEN RENDER A STATEMENT AT INTERVALS
<br />COVERING ZOo ON AN ITEMIZED LIST OF THE TAXES. IN ADDiTfON TO THIS
<br />2O~o I WOULU RECEIVE SUCH FEES A5 ARE ALLOWED BY COURT IN SUTTS TO
<br />EN'fORCE LIENS, NAMELY, AN ATTORNEY FEE OF $S.OO TO ¢15.CO, 5o ON THE
<br />GROSS SALES AND THE FEE FOR THE DEED TO THE PURCHASER. ONLY THE
<br />~S.OC TC 15.00 FEE WOULD BECOLLECTIB!_E UNLESS THE SUIT WERE CARRIED
<br />THROUGH TO SALE. THESE FEES WOULD NOT PREVENT THE CITY FROM COLLECTING
<br />ITS TAXES IN FULL IF THE LAND SOLO FOR ENOUGH MONEY TO PAY THE TAXES
<br />AND COSTS.
<br />THE CITY WILL BE NOTIFIED 'H`ELL IN ADVANCE OF EACH SALE SO THAT
<br />IF IT CHOSE TO DO SU IT COULD BID ON THE PROPERTY TO PROTECT ITS
<br />
|