Laserfiche WebLink
360 <br /> <br />APPROPRIATION: <br />SUPPLEMENTAL <br />APPROPRIATION, <br />JOB TRAINING & <br />PARTNERSHIP ACT <br />PROGRAM <br /> <br />RESOLUTION: <br />REQUESTING U.S. <br />CONGRESS TO <br />ADOPT LEGISLA- <br />TION TO PROTECT <br />MUNICIPALITIES <br />FROM LIABILITY <br />UNDER ANTITRUST <br />LAWS <br /> <br />Program Year <br /> <br />1983-1984 <br /> <br />1983-1984 <br /> <br />19.82-1983 <br /> <br />1983-1984 <br />1983-1984 <br />1983-1984 <br />1983-1984 <br />1982-1983 <br /> <br />1983-1984 <br /> <br />Account Code <br /> <br />24-51020 <br />24-51040 <br />24-72050 <br /> <br />24-72120 <br />24-31050 <br />24-31080 <br />24-31130 <br />24-71010 <br /> <br />24-72180 <br /> <br />Purp o s e <br /> <br />Reduction <br /> <br />Riverview Park <br />Improvements 10;000.00 <br />Tonsler Park Im- <br />provements 3,000.00 <br />East Market St. <br />Relocation <br /> Assistance 4,130.00 <br />Handicapped Access 10,000.00 <br />Rosser Ave. Sidewalk <br />Belmont Park Drainage <br />5th St, S.W. Sidewalk <br />E. Market St. Free Paint <br /> Program <br />Fifeville Free Paint <br /> Program <br /> $32,833.84 <br /> <br />Addition <br /> <br /> 28,561.01 <br /> 44.37 <br /> 913.53 <br /> <br /> 314.93 <br /> <br /> 3,000.00 <br />'$32,833.84 <br /> <br /> 2) <br />expenditure accounts will be as follows: <br /> <br />After the above changes, the appropriation to individual <br /> <br />Program Year <br /> <br />1982-1983 <br />1982-1983 <br />1982-1983 <br />1982-1983 <br />1982-1983 <br /> <br />1982-1983 <br /> <br />Account Code Project <br /> <br />24-19010 <br />24-42010 <br />24-42030 <br />24-42060 <br />24-71010 <br /> <br />24-72050 <br /> <br />.24-31050 <br /> <br />CDBG Administration <br />Red Cross Home Care <br />Workshop V <br /> Infant Development Project <br />E. Market St. Free Paint <br /> Program <br />E. Market St. Relocation <br /> Assistance <br /> Rosser Ave. Sidewalk- <br /> <br />1983-1984 <br /> <br />Appropriation <br /> <br />1983-1984 <br />1983-1984 <br />1983-1984 <br />1983-1584 <br />1983=1984 <br />1983-1984 <br />1983-1984 <br /> <br />47,463.97 <br />14,778.91 <br /> 7,917.00 <br /> 7,370.87 <br /> <br />5,314.93 <br /> <br />3,870..00 <br />41,561;01 <br /> <br />24-31080 Belmont Park Drainage 7,044.37 <br />24-31090 10th & Page Signal 870.33 <br />24-31130 5th St.~ S.W. Sidewalk -4,913.53 <br />24-51010 Rives Park Improvements 9,895.08 <br />24-51020 Riverview Park Improvements 0 <br />24-72120 Handicapped Access 10,000.00 <br />24-72180 Fifeville Free Paint Program 10,000.00 <br /> <br />Mr. Hendrix stated that this appropriation reflected additional. <br /> <br />federal funds which had been made available for the summer program <br /> <br />for the JTPA Program. <br /> <br /> Dr~ Hall moved the appropriation of ~1,S09,234.00 for the Job <br />Training and Partnership Act Program, Dr. Gunter seconded the motion <br />and it was carried over to the next meeting for consideration. <br /> <br /> Mr. Wiley stated that the Supreme Court had recently rendered <br />decisions which had subjected cities to be held liable for antitrust <br />acts. Mr. Wiley stated that the Nati. onal League of Cities, Virginia <br />Municipal League, and Association of Municipal Law Officers were <br />.encouraging Congress to change the law and this resolution'would <br />reflect Council's endorsement of-the necessary legislation. <br /> <br />Mrs. Gleason moved the resolution Requesting the U.S. Congress <br /> <br />to Adopt Legislation to Protect Municipalities from Liability under <br />Antitrust Laws, Dr. Hall seconded the motion and it was unanimously <br /> <br />approved by Council. <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court, Parker v. Brown, <br />317 U. S. 341 (1943), established the' Parker Doctrine, a state <br />action exemption test granting immunity to states from federal <br />antitrust liability; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court, in Community <br />Communications v. City.of Boulder, 455 U. S. 40 (1982)', held <br />that the Parker Doctrine did not automatically give local <br />governments immunity from federal antitrust liability; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, until the Boulder decision and other recent court <br />decisions it had been assumed that the Parker Doctrine applied <br />to local as well as to state government; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the Boulder decision has exposed local governments <br />to litigation in many of their regulatory, planning, franchising <br />and other day-to-day activities; and <br /> <br /> <br />