Laserfiche WebLink
32.3 <br /> <br /> Ms. Dorothy Bushey of Hilltop Road asked that the southbound <br />traffic from Hydraulic Road be not allowed access to Rugby as it <br />creates dangerous conditions on Hilltop, a narrow road not <br />designed for such traffic. <br /> <br /> Mr, Peter Wyeth of 1517 Dairy Ro~.d asked that northbound <br /> <br />traffic from Rugby to Hydraulic be ali <br />and keep the traffic flow between Rugt <br /> <br /> Mr.., Ralph File of 1526 Dairy Roa <br />of northbound traffic from Rugby to R~ <br />such traffic to Dairy which cannot ham <br />a petition to this effect from neighb0 <br />the accident rate on the northbound 1~ <br />by this proposal. <br /> <br />owed to accommodate com~uters <br />y and Dairy evenly distributed. <br /> <br /> objected to the restriction <br />draulic because it Would divert <br />dle the flow. He presented <br />rs on Dairy Road and mentioned <br />ne of Dairy as being worsened <br /> <br /> Mr. Alex Dudley, President of the Barracks/RugbyfPreston Neighbor- <br />hood Association supported Mr. Reed about restricting southbound <br /> <br />traffic from entering Rugby Road. <br /> <br /> Ms. Brook Taylor of 1104 Hilltop <br />problems are very bad and it is. becomi <br />Road; she supported the southbound tra <br /> <br /> A resident of 1415 .Rugby Road als <br />traffic entering Rugby Road, stating tl <br />neighborhood to allow that volume .of t~ <br /> <br /> Mr. William Roberts of 1503 Rugby <br />heavy tra£fic that would result from t <br /> <br />Road said that Hilltop's traffic <br />~g a feeder route to Barracks <br />ffic restriction. <br /> <br /> objected to the southbound <br /> <br /> at it would destroy the <br /> <br />~affic. <br /> <br /> Road also objected to the <br /> <br />le southbound flow. <br /> <br />Preston Neighbor! <br />the position of <br />southbound traff <br /> <br />There being <br />and Council disc~ <br /> <br />que~tion from Mr <br />sta~ed that the <br />fl~ since the hE <br />int~rsection. M~ <br />and Transportatic <br />a d~sign incorpor <br />or ~orthhound. M <br />fre acces~ to ho <br />gre4 n time for 25 <br />aai4 the design a <br />Roa, hut no bike <br />system at that ix <br />Kroger facility a <br /> <br /> On motion hy <br />approved the desi <br />of southbound tra <br />traffic from Rugb <br /> <br />Mr. David Nelson, a member of the boar. d of the Barracks/Rugby/ <br /> .ood Association, stetted that the board had taken <br /> <br />eeking a return to th~ <br />c into Rugby Road. <br />no other speakers, th <br />.ased the issue with C~ <br /> <br /> Albro, Mr. Jim Marst~ <br />ity had taken no quanJ <br />rricades were removed <br /> <br />Don Wagner~ of the <br />~, stated that the de <br />sting one~way flow wi <br />r~ Wagner and Mr~ Mar~ <br />th lanes of traffi~ wc <br />0 Bypass traffic going <br />llowed for pedestrian <br />~aths are included as <br />~ersection. Cuts will <br />t 29 North and Hydrau] <br /> <br /> Ma~ Gleaaon, seConde~ <br />~n with the amendment <br />ffic from Hydraulic tc <br />~ to Hydraulic as well <br /> <br />experiment of restricting <br /> <br /> public hearing was closed <br /> <br />.ty staff. In response to a <br />tll, City Traffic Engineer, <br />~itative counts of traffic <br />at the RUgby/250 Bypass <br />;tare Department of Highways <br />,artment could work with <br /> <br />~h no preference for southbound <br />hall explained that allowing <br />uld considerably reduce the <br /> <br /> east and west. Mr. Marshall <br />novement both ways on Hydraulic <br />there are no links to the County <br /> <br /> be provided for the new <br /> <br /> lc, Mr. 'Wagner said. <br /> <br /> by Mr. Conover, CoUncil <br /> <br />mf~.returning to the restriction <br /> Rugby and allowing northbound <br /> as providing for four lanes <br /> <br /> <br />