Laserfiche WebLink
Appropriation re: $20,000 <br />Day Care Service - Community <br />Development Revenue Sharing <br /> <br />Agreement re: Memorandum <br />Garrett Street Urban Renewal <br />Project <br /> <br />Executive Session <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, it appears to Council that the notices required <br /> by §15.1-364 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended, have <br /> been duly posted; <br /> <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the <br /> <br /> City of Charlottesville that James P. Borden, Mason S. Byrd <br /> and Lee Greaver be and the same are hereby appointed as viewers, <br /> to view such alley and report in writing to Council what <br /> inconvenience, if any, would result from the vacation thereof. <br /> <br /> The resolution appropriating $20,000 from Community Development <br />Revenue Sharing Funds for purchase of Day Care Services, which <br />was offered at the meeting of the Council on July 21, 1975, was <br />adopted by the following recorded vote. Ayes: Mr. Barbour, Mr. <br />Fife, Mr. Gilliam, Mrs. Rinehart and Mr. Van Yahres. Noes: None. <br /> <br /> Mr. Fife presented a memorandum of agreement between the City <br />Council and the Redevelopment and Housing Authority relative to <br />the Garrett Street Urban Renewal Project. A motion by Mr. Fife, <br />seconded by Mr. Van Yahres that the Council endorse the memorandum <br />of agreement, was adopted by the following vote. Ayes: Mr. <br />Barbour, Mr. Fife, Mrs. Rinehart and Mr. Van Yahres. Noes: Mr. <br />Gilliam. Mr. Gilliam stated that he could not vote for endorsing <br />the memorandum of agreement because not much of the development <br />of Garrett Street that he agrees with. He stated he hoped this <br />would be a development, developed primarily as a residential <br />area in line with the suggestion made to the Council by <br /> <br />Lawrence Halprin, but that it is apparent that is not going to be <br />the case. The way this development is heading it is going to be <br />in his opinion primarily industrial and heavy commercial. He <br />also stated he disagrees with the selection of Bartholomew as <br />the principal planning consultant and that Halprin has been <br />engaged to come up with an over all plan, but they are being <br />disregarded and that the work Bartholomew has done in the past <br />has not worked well. <br /> <br /> On motion by Mr. Gilliam, seconded by Mr. Van Yahres the <br />Council voted to go into executive session to discuss personnel, <br />property acquisition and pending litigation, by the following <br />recorded vote. Ayes: Mr. Barbour, Mr. Fife, Mr. Gilliam, Mrs. <br />Rinehart and Mr. Van Yahres. Noes: None. <br /> <br /> On motion the meeting adjourned. <br /> <br />Pres ide~t <br /> <br />BASEMENT CONFERENCE ROOM -MONDAY, AUGUST <br /> 25, 1975 <br /> <br />Pursuant to the following call: <br /> <br />Mr. Charles L. Barbour <br />Mr. Francis H. Fife <br />Mr. George H. Gilliam <br />Mrs. Jill T. Rinehart <br />Mr. Mitchell Van Yahres <br /> <br /> <br />