Laserfiche WebLink
5 <br />Schilling asked what the City specifically hopes to accomplish. Mr. Schilling said he <br />does not want to repeat what is happening with the University garage, and wants to bring <br />in people who wil l be affected from the beginning. <br /> <br /> Mr. Cox said he agrees, but would like the Council to take action so the <br />interchanges can be looked at. Mr. Cox said Council needs to start talking with <br />constituents who will be affected by this. <br /> <br /> Ms. Richards said she feels the issue needs to be addressed again because of the <br />increase in traffic and big County development. Ms. Richard said she hopes we can get <br />to the point where a new design can be developed that will not affect adjacent businesses. <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravati sai d he would like to take a slower approach, and asked what has <br />changed since 1995. Mr. Caravati asked what benefit there is to the City to improve the <br />intersection to help County businesses. Mr. Caravati said having specifics about the <br />impact to businesse s is paramount, as is including how the intersection at Route 29 and <br />the Route 250 Bypass figures into this. <br /> <br /> Mr. Cox said he thinks Council has to think about what is in the best interest of <br />both jurisdictions. Mr. Cox said he feels Council needs to ent ertain a resolution <br />regarding grade separated interchanges and asked staff to prepare a resolution that <br />th <br />addresses issues raised by Councilors for the August 5 Council meeting. <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravati said he thinks Council should hold a public hearing on the issu e. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch said he thinks the project needs to be beneficial for the regional. He <br />said historically the City ends up holding the short end of the stick. He said a <br />comprehensive solution needs to be looked at that takes into consideration a southern <br />p arkway and eastern connector. Mr. Lynch said Council might want to talk with the <br />County before moving forward. <br /> <br /> Mr. Schilling said he would like to reinforce the notion of a public hearing. <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravati asked that the resolution be circulated to Counci l in advance of the <br />th <br />August 5 meeting. <br /> <br />CONSENT AGENDA <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch removed the ordinance rezoning Carlton Road from the consent <br />agenda. <br /> <br /> Mr. Schilling removed the resolution forgiving the loan for MACAA and <br />resolution allowing JAUNT to keep surplus fund s from the consent agenda. <br /> <br /> On motion by Mr. Caravati, seconded by Mr. Lynch, the following consent <br />agenda items were approved by the following vote, with Mr. Schilling abstaining from <br />th <br />approval of the minutes of June 27 . Ayes: Mr. Caravati, Mr. Cox, M r. Lynch, Ms. <br />Richards, Mr. Schilling. Noes: None. <br /> <br />a. Minutes of June 27 and July 1 <br /> <br />APPROPRIATION <br />b. : $716,000 - FY 2002/2003 Community Development Block <br /> Grant (carried over) <br /> <br />APPROPRIATION <br />c. : Reprogramming of community D evelopment Block Grant <br /> Funds (carried over) <br /> <br />APPROPRIATION <br />d. : $102,500 - Housing Opportunities Made Equal (HOME) <br /> Grant Funds (carried over) <br /> <br />APPROPRIATION <br />e. : $123,131 - Victim Wit ness Program Grant (carried over) <br /> <br />APPROPRIATION <br />f. : $20,000 - Reappropriating OAR Funds for Drug Court <br />