Laserfiche WebLink
5 <br />a commission on the sale. He noted that the program was discussed on a 30 second spot <br />on CNN television. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch thanked the Board for their work and said it is a great program. He <br />said in the context of what the City spends for art, education and tourism, he thinks the <br />program is a good value. <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravati said he is not sure that $10,000 is enough, and said he feels it <br />provides a good return on investment. <br /> <br /> Ms. Richards said that one of the strengths of the program is that it was initiated <br />by civic and art minded citizens. She said it is promoted as a model for publ ic - private art <br />partnership, and brings prestige to and interest in Charlottesville. <br /> <br /> Mr. Cox thanked the Board for making the mundane art of driving and riding a <br />little more entertaining. He said the program is clearly a big success and a small budget <br />it em. Mr. Cox said that he and Ms. Richards are working on developing a charge for an <br />Arts Task Force to look at art and culture and how the City can more appropriately <br />support it, which should be given to Council in the next few weeks. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch made a m otion to renew the license for three years for Art in Place and <br />to approve $10,000 for next year, Mr. Caravati seconded the motion and it was approved <br />by the following vote. Ayes: Mr. Caravati, Mr. Cox, Mr. Lynch, Ms. Richards, Mr. <br />Schilling. Noes: Non e. <br /> <br />REPORT/APPROVAL <br />: VDOT STATEMENT RE: PRIORITIES <br /> <br /> Mr. O'Connell said that the only change in the priorities that were submitted last <br />year is the addition of a request for emergency funding for Belmont Bridge which needs <br />repairing. <br /> <br /> Mr. Jim Tolbert, Director of Neighborhood Development Services, said there is a <br />separate listing for projects underway and those projects identified last year. <br /> <br /> Responding to a question from Mr. Cox, Mr. Tolbert said that the amount being <br />request for Belmont Bridge is $ 1.6 million. <br /> <br /> Mr. O'Connell said that Council also needs to approve a project programming <br />resolution for Belmont Bridge. <br /> <br /> Mr. Cox said the Belmont Bridge is not very pedestrian friendly and the best <br />solution may not be to just replace what is there. He asked if there is a margin to make it <br />more attractive and pedestrian friendly. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tolbert said that after Belmont Bridge is approved as a project, the City can <br />have that kind of discussion with VDOT. He said there are several more steps in the <br />process . <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravati suggested that the statement to VDOT include our appreciation for <br />allowing the City's urban allocation to be used for transit funding. <br /> <br /> Ms. Richards said she would also like to include a thank you to VDOT for their <br />flexibility in allowing localities to administer their own construction projects and for <br />allowing flexibility on street widths. <br /> <br /> Mr. Schilling said he recalls the non - statistical method used last year to construct <br />the existing priority listing, which resulted in Meadowcreek Par kway, a priority for three <br />Councilors, being listed as number three. He suggested we assure that the list accurately <br />reflects Councilors' priorities. <br /> <br />