My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-09-15
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2003
>
2003-09-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2004 10:10:19 AM
Creation date
10/12/2004 5:53:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
9/15/2003
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 <br /> Ms. Richards said one of the biggest issues with the new zoning ordinance is the <br />University zoning concept, and said she would not have supported it if she thought it <br />would have a negative impact. She said enforcement of the three - person rule a nd permit <br />parking are important parts of the package. She said she would like to move forward <br />with the house banking program, and concentrate more housing on high density corridors <br />and lure renters away from single family homes. She agreed that outcome m easures are <br />needed, and we need to discuss how to do this. She said that the Jefferson Area Board for <br />Aging has interesting housing recommendations regarding housing for the elderly. She <br />said she is glad that Martha Jefferson House's nursing facility wil l be allowed by right. <br />She asked that Mr. Tolbert be a liaison with JABA. <br /> <br /> Mr. Cox thanked the Charlottesville community for taking this big step. He said <br />he thinks it is a compelling vision and he looks forward to seeing it unfold. <br /> <br />REPORT/APPROVAL <br />: BI KE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN <br /> <br /> Mr. O'Connell explained that having a Bike and Pedestrian Plan allows the City to <br />seek outside funding. He said changes have been made after Council's review last spring. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tolbert reviewed the process and project goals for the Plan. He said the plan <br />has been revised to include an executive summary that provides details on what the plan <br />contains and what the primary emphasis is. Priorities have been reviewed to include a <br />specific set of lower cost recommendations and revis ions to the larger scale projects to <br />break them into fundable increments. He said the Plan has the support of trails groups <br />and the biking community. Mr. Tolbert said the intent is to focus on building one quality <br />block rather than one mile average. <br /> <br /> Mr . Lynch thanked staff and the committee who worked on the Plan. He said it <br />has come a long way on on - road projects, and he hopes we can continue to expand streets <br />where dual bike lanes will fit. He said he has some reservations about the Plan, and <br />disagr ees that it is more important to do one block great rather than one mile average <br />because he does not think that is where the community's priority is. He said the Plan <br />calls for too much concrete rather than asphalt. He said he is looking for quantity. <br /> <br /> Mr. Cox said he has a question about oversight to assure things are getting done, <br />and Mr. Tolbert said that staff positions are shifting and it will be part of one staff <br />member's duties to deal with the Bike and Pedestrian Plan. <br /> <br /> Mr. Schilling said he had many concerns when he saw the Plan last spring, but <br />now can support it. He agreed about the over use of concrete and also with the quantity <br />versus quality statement. Mr. Schilling said his greatest concern with the Plan once it is <br />approved is how to mai ntain and fund it. He said his priority will be to make sure <br />existing City infrastructure is maintained. <br /> <br /> On motion by Ms. Richards, seconded by Mr. Caravati, Council approved the <br />Bike and Pedestrian Plan by the following vote. Ayes: Mr. Caravati, Mr. Cox, Mr. <br />Lynch, Ms. Richards, Mr. Schilling. Noes: None. <br /> <br />ORDINANCE <br />: SNOW REMOVAL CODE AMENDMENTS <br /> <br /> Mr. O'Connell said that the City's snow removal ordinance was reviewed as a <br />result of last year's heavy snows. He said the existing requirement that sno w be removed <br />from sidewalks within six hours is unrealistic. He said staff recommend that the deadline <br />be extended to 24 hours and an additional 24 hours after a warning before a penalty. <br /> <br /> Responding to a question from Mr. Caravati, Ms. Renee Knake, Assi stant City <br />Attorney, said that the penalty is a Class I misdemeanor which allows a fine up to $2,500 <br />or 12 months in jail. <br /> <br /> Responding to a question from Mr. Schilling, Ms. Knake said the warnings and <br />summons to General District Court will likely be giv en by Community Service Officers. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.