2003-11-03 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

103 Mr. Lynch said he agrees. He sa id Council's normal policy is not to charge if conveyance of land does not create a developable lot, but he feels this is more of a commercial transaction than what Council normally sees. Mr. Richards asked if this property is subject to routine maintena nce by the City, and Mr. O'Connell said that the property has been maintained by the property owner. Mr. Schilling said that this situation is not a surprise to the current property owners as they were aware of it in 1993. Mr. Brown said that if the ma jority of Council wants to sell the property, he recommends that the ordinance reflect a sales price of $3 a square foot since the exact amount of land is unknown at this time. Mr. David Toscano, attorney for the Casters, owners of the property in questi on, said it is true that these issues have been around for some time. He said the owners found out about it at the time of their closing but chose to close rather than delay. He said that the consent to encroachment in 1989 was never put to record. He s aid guidelines have been set in place by Council regarding selling or gifting property and the precedent has been that unless a developable lot is produced it is done by conveyance. He said a sales contract is pending contingent upon working out this issu e. He said the property owners will not receive any additional money for this property. He noted that land was conveyed by the City in 1996 right across the street from this property. He said on the basis of precedent, he does not think the owners shoul d be charged. He said this property will be added to the tax rolls and the assessment will likely increase as a result. He also noted that the property owners have maintained the property for years. Responding to a question from Mr. Cox, Mr. Toscano sa id the owners have no problem with the City reserving property for a future sidewalk. Mr. Schilling said the fact that the property is not developable is not the issue here. He said it is true that there will be no extra value to the property, but there will be less value to the property if the owner does not rectify the problem. He said the question is will the property owner pay or will the City pitch in and pay. He said this has been an issue for ten years. He said in the other case cited by Mr. Tos cano there was considerably less land involved and an exchange of property with the City. Mr. Schilling made a motion to approve the ordinance, to include a sales price of $3 per square foot and Mr. Lynch seconded the motion. Ms. Richards said she wo uld like to speak against the motion. She said that while the motion is reasonable, she does not believe the sellers are going to gain materially by the conveyance. She said the City has not been using the property and it has no real value to the City. Mr. Cox said he shares Ms. Richards' perspective. Mr. Lynch said he feels the difference is that this is more of a commercial transaction. "AN ORDINANCE TO AUTHORIZE SALE OF A PORTION OF THE CASTALIA STREET RIGHT - OF - WAY TO JEFFREY AND KAREN KASTER" was offered and carried over to the next meeting for consideration. REPORT : JEFFERSON SCHOOL TASK FORCE Ms. Lelia Brown, Co - chair of the Jefferson School Task Force, said that the Task Force has been thoroughly exploring options for Jefferson School whil e respecting the original purpose of the school. Ms. Mary Means, facilitator to the Task Force, reviewed the Task Force process. She said that the Task Force agreed on "what is important" and that whatever is done in