My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-05-02
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2005
>
2005-05-02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2005 3:07:27 PM
Creation date
8/24/2005 2:48:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
5/2/2005
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dr. Brown said we could discuss finding ways to go back to the groups and get <br />their input. He asked if there is a way to address Ms. Hamilton's concerns in the context <br />of larger issues. He said correcting the imbalance of neighborhoods becomes an issue of <br />its own. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch said he will be unable to attend the work session. He said the Strategic <br />Plan and CIP are interrelated. He said neighborhood plans have utility beyond just the <br />capital planning piece, and they need to be brought up to date. He said some <br />neighborhoods feel they should be separated and we should look at whether <br />neighborhood boundaries are done correctly. <br /> <br /> Mr. O'Connell said the neighborhood improvement plan could be put as one of <br />the top strategies. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tolbert said that he has less staff now and going back to all the <br />neighborhoods with the existing resources would be difficult to do. He said we are trying <br />to find a process we can manage. He said what was heard at a recent meeting was that <br />issues remain the same as before. <br /> <br /> Dr. Brown suggested that in general, as we move forward, we should be cognizant <br />of reaching out to people who do not normally turn out at meetings. <br /> <br />ORDINANCE: REZON1NG 1014 DRUID AVENUE FROM R-iS TO PUD <br /> <br /> Mr. Ron Higgins, Planner in Neighborhood Development Services, explained that <br />this rezoning was considered and sent back to the Planning Commission for <br />reconsideration of an alternate plan for five detached units instead often attached. He <br />said that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch asked if the streets have to be public, and Mr. Higgins said that streets <br />in a PUD can be private. <br /> <br /> On motion by Mr. Caravati, seconded by Ms. Hamilton, the ordinance entitled <br />"AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING THE ZONING DISTRICT <br />MAP INCORPORATED IN SECTION 34-1 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE <br />CODE OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, 1990, AS AMENDED, BY THE <br />REZONING OF PARCELS 1241 AND 125, CITY TAX MAP 60 (1014 DRUID <br />AVENUE) FROM R- 1 S TO PUD" was offered and carried over to the next meeting for <br />consideration. <br /> <br />ORDINANCE: REZONING JOHN STREET PROPERTY FROM 4-2U TO PUD <br /> <br /> Ms. Ashley Cooper, Planner in Neighborhood Development Services, explained <br />that the City conveyed land to Piedmont Housing Alliance who is the applicant for this <br />rezoning. She said six townhouse style homes are proposed, with one to be sold to a City <br />resident who earns less than 80% of the area median income, but she noted that PHA is <br />willing to change this to 80% of the Charlottesville median income. Ms. Cooper said that <br />the Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mark Watson of PHA said that a second unit will be targeted to someone at <br />80% of the Charlottesville median income or below. He said the other units will be sold <br />at market rate. Mr. Watson said the City sold the land for $75,000 with the requirement <br />that one unit be sold below market. Mr. Watson said the closing has not occurred <br />because it was dependent on the rezoning. He said that coming to agreement with <br />Dominion Power has held up the project. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brown said that the Assessor put a fair market value of the property at <br />$75,000. He said the sales contract also referred to the range of the sales price for the <br />market rate houses. <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravati asked what amount has been spent on infrastructure problems, and <br />Mr. Watson said approximately $75,000 in design and engineering so far. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.