Laserfiche WebLink
447 <br /> <br /> On motion by Ms. Hamilton, seconded by Mr. Lynch, Council approved the <br />Historic Guidelines by the following vote. Ayes: Dr. Brown, Mr. Caravati, Ms. <br />Hamilton, Mr. Lynch, Mr. Schilling. Noes: None. <br /> <br />ORDINANCES: TAX CODE UPDATES (COMPLYING WITH STATE CODE <br />CHANGES) <br /> <br /> Ms. Kelley said that since the packet was sent to Council, staff in the <br />Commissioner of Revenue's office pointed that that language that gives 30 days before <br />charging interest on three taxes should remain. <br /> <br /> Mr. Schilling asked why there should be special dispensation for these three taxes, <br />if there is no such dispensation for interest on real estate taxes. <br /> <br /> Ms. Kelley said that other than it has been done historically and the fact that this <br />is what the computer is set up to do, she does not know. She said these taxes are <br />collected for a third party and a grace period has been given. <br /> <br /> Responding to a question from Mr. Schilling, Ms. Kelley said she believes that <br />meals taxes are remitted on a rolling monthly basis. <br /> <br /> Mr. Schilling said that people have 30 days to work this out. He said meals and <br />transient lodging taxes are paid at the time people pay their bill. He said he is advocating <br />parity with citizens who are paying taxes. He asked if the public collects interest after 30 <br />days when the City owes them money. <br /> <br />Ms. Kelley said she can provide more information before the second reading. <br /> <br /> Ms. Hamilton asked if State law allows a grace period for interest on real estate <br />taxes, and Ms. Kelley said she will have to check. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch said he agrees with Mr. Schilling and would prefer that all things be <br />equal, but said he would rather have the interest on these taxes collected the same as <br />others. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch made a motion to approve the original wording and asked that Council <br />be given a better explanation about why the grace period needs to be included. <br /> <br />Mr. Caravati seconded the motion. <br /> <br /> The ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTERS 14 <br />(LICENSES) AND 30 (TAXATION) OF THE CITY CODE, TO UPDATE <br />PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO APPEALS OF LOCAL BUS1NESS LICENSE <br />TAXES; INTEREST AND PENALTIES ON VARIOUS TAXES; CLASSIFICATION <br />AND TAXATION OF TANGLE PERSONAL PROPERTY; AND <br />IMPLEMENTATION OF "FILING BY EXCEPTION" FOR RETURNS OF CERTAIN <br />PROPERTY" was offered and carried over to the next meeting for consideration. <br /> <br /> On motion by Mr. Lynch, seconded by Mr. Caravati, the ordinance entitled "AN <br />ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PERSONAL <br />PROPERTY TAX RELIEF ACT OF 1998" was offered and carried over to the next <br />meeting for consideration. <br /> <br />PUBLIC <br /> <br /> Ms. Logan Blanca, 1200 E. Jefferson Street, continued reading the letter from the <br />earlier in the meeting regarding the proposal for 1111 Little High Street. She said the <br />residents are not getting answers from Region Ten about whether or not there will be on- <br />site staff. She said representatives of Region Ten have been invited to a neighborhood <br />forum on October 29th. <br /> <br /> <br />