My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-04-03
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2006
>
2006-04-03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2007 10:00:51 AM
Creation date
7/25/2007 9:51:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
4/3/2006
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
113 <br />different rates for homeowners, and commercial and rental properties. He said <br />homeowner assessments are rising more than others and the burden has been shifted to <br />the homeowner. He said the Governor thought it was a good solution to allow <br />differential rates, but the General Assembly did not approve his proposal. He said this is <br />something we should look to do in the upcoming year. He asked Council to consider the <br />resolution he presented tonight asking the legislature officially to grant Charlottesville <br />that authority. <br /> <br /> Dr. Brown suggested that issue be discussed during Other Business. <br /> <br /> Ms. Hamilton said she wanted to comment on the budget process. She thanked <br />City staff who she knows hear a lot of complaints during tax time. She said she thinks it <br />is important to say thank you. She said questions from Council and citizens require a lot <br />of staff time. <br /> <br />APPROPRIATION <br />: ANNUAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravati said his goal is still to reduce the tax rate to $1, and he asked <br />Council to consider reducing the Council reserve from $75,000 to $50,000 and reducing <br />the pay increase from 4% to 3.25%. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch said he said he is concerned about salaries even though he recognizes <br />that we get good work. He said the salary increases over the past five years have <br />exceeded the rate of inflation. He also noted the increasing cost of health care. He said <br />there are other areas he would prefer to cut. He said Council talked about cutting take <br />home cars for the police except for City residents. He said he is concerned about health <br />care generally and retiree health care in particular. He said we should look at the co-pay <br />for spouses after retirement. He said we should also look at wellness programs. <br /> <br /> Dr. Brown said he is not in favor of reducing employee raises. He said we hire <br />employees in a competitive market place, and he would argue against doing that. <br /> <br /> Ms. Hamilton said she does not support this for reasons previously stated. <br /> <br /> Mr. Schilling said he previously supported reducing Council reserve to $10,000 <br />and thinks that is enough “play money” as he said a former Councilor referred to the <br />reserve. He said he asked for more information but has not received it. He said he finds <br />it troubling that Mr. Caravati’s recommendation to cut salary increases was offered after <br />the public hearing so that there is no opportunity for comment on the proposal. <br /> <br />th <br /> Mr. Lynch said Council has until April 11 to finalize the budget and there are <br />other pots of money, such as the public safety disability benefit package that provides full <br />retirement because of an injury that does not preclude working in a different capacity <br />which he does not think is fair to taxpayers. <br /> <br /> No support was expressed for Mr. Caravati’s suggestion to reduce salary <br />increases. <br /> <br /> Mr. O’Connell said he just received information based on a new calculation of <br />personal property taxes to be received. He explained that the budget guidelines reduced <br />the real estate by changing the valuation method of personal property taxes. He said that <br />while it has not been looked at in depth, he now understands that there will be enough <br />money projected as revenue from personal property taxes to allow a tax rate of $1, <br />combined with the reduction in the Council reserve. He said he thinks that state revenues <br />for personal property taxes were underbudgeted. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch said that works for him. He made a motion to reduce Council reserve <br />by $50,000, and adjust the target figure to $680,000 to achieve an additional ½ cent <br />reduction in the tax rate. <br /> <br /> Mr. Schilling seconded the motion. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.