My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-04-17
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2006
>
2006-04-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2007 10:01:06 AM
Creation date
7/25/2007 9:54:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
4/17/2006
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
142 <br />provisions of Item 503 of Chapter 951 of the 2005 Acts of Assembly (the 2005 revisions <br />to the 2004-2006 appropriations Act, hereinafter referred to as the “2005 Appropriations <br />Act”); and <br /> <br />WHEREAS <br /> the above-referenced legislative enactments require the City to take <br />affirmative steps to implement changes to the PPTRA and to provide for the computation <br />and allocation of relief provided pursuant to the PPTRA, as revised; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS <br /> , the above-referenced legislative enactments provide for the <br />appropriation to the City of Charlottesville of a fixed sum, to be used exclusively for the <br />provision of tax relief to owners of qualifying personal-use vehicles that are subject to <br />personal property taxation; <br /> <br />WHEREAS <br /> , the City of Charlottesville has elected to compute tax relief as a <br />specific dollar amount to be offset against the total taxes that would otherwise be due, but <br />for PPTRA, and the reporting of such specific dollar relief on individual tax bills, as <br />authorized by the 2005 Appropriations Act, item 503(E), which requires City Council to <br />annually, by resolution, set the rate of tax relief at a level that is anticipated to fully <br />exhaust the PPTRA relief funds provided by the Commonwealth to the City, and to <br />establish specific criteria for the allocation of the Commonwealth’s payments among the <br />owners of qualifying vehicles; <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED <br /> by the City Council for the City of <br />Charlottesville THAT qualifying vehicles obtaining situs within the City during the Tax <br />Year commencing on January 1, 2006 shall receive personal property tax relief in the <br />following manner: <br /> <br />?? <br />Qualifying vehicles valued at $1,000 or less will be eligible for 100% tax relief; <br /> <br />?? <br />Qualifying vehicles valued at $1,001 up to $20,000 will be eligible for 53 % tax <br />relief; <br /> <br />?? <br />Qualifying vehicles valued at $20,001 or more shall only receive 53% tax relief <br />on the first $20,000 of value; <br /> <br />?? <br />Vehicles which do not meet the definition of a qualifying vehicle shall not be <br />eligible for any form of tax relief under this program; and <br /> <br />APPROPRIATION <br />: FY 06-07 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT <br />nd <br />AND HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES MADE EQUAL (HOME) FUNDS (2 reading) <br /> <br /> Ms. Amy Kilroy, Planner in Neighborhood Development Services, recommended <br />that Council approve the proposed budgets. She said following Mr. Mason’s comments <br />at the last meeting, staff talked with AHIP and are recommending that the relationship <br />with AHIP and the Housing Authority be looked at, and that recommendations for new <br />guidelines be made in July. <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravati asked if AHIP’s work is reviewed on a regular basis or is complaint <br />driven, and Ms. Kilroy said they are done on a regular basis. <br /> <br /> Ms. Hamilton said that following Mr. Mason’s comments she talked to AHIP <br />Board Members, and said there may have been a misunderstanding regarding the <br />photographs that Mr. Mason showed Council as most of the things in the pictures had <br />been corrected. She said the roof leak is an ongoing issue, and AHIP has said they will <br />address that at no cost to the homeowner. She noted that AHIP does more safety repairs <br />than cosmetic. <br /> <br /> Mr. Kilroy said that the proposed review of the partnership with AHIP is not in <br />any way meant to punish AHIP. <br /> <br /> Ms. Hamilton said she thinks the review is appropriate. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.