Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> <br /> <br />REPORTS <br />: UPDATE TO HOUSING STRATEGIC PLAN AND <br />CHARLOTTESVILLE AFFORDABLE HOUSING INVESTMENT PROGRAM <br /> <br />Mr. Jim Tolbert, Director of Neighborhood Development Services, said that <br />Council deferred action on the Housing Vision Theme at its previous work session so that <br />the proposed Charlottesville Affordable Housing Investment Program (CAHIP) could be <br />discussed in more detail. He said other changes made at the work session have been <br />incorporated. Mr. Tolbert said that the Housing Advisory Committee has been meeting <br />since September, and recommended CAHIP with funding to come from the following <br />primary sources: 1) 25% transient room tax set aside - $500,000; 2) developer <br />contributions - $500,000; 3) CDBG/HOME entitlement - $570,000; and 4) one cent real <br />property tax set aside - $420,000. The proposal suggests that the funds be used as <br />follows: 1) CDBG Housing/HOME/HOME Match funds for next 10 years to <br />Charlottesville Redevelopment and Housing Authority’s (CRHA) efforts to revitalize <br />public housing for a total FY 08 allocation of approximately $570,000; 2) developer <br />contributions – all affordable housing contributions collected would be dedicated to the <br />Thomas Jefferson Community Workforce Housing Fund for low and moderate-income <br />homebuyers (under $80% AMI), estimated at $500,000 a year; 3) one cent real property <br />tax set aside – dedicated to initiatives that preserve and expand homeownership <br />opportunities for low-income (under 60% AMI) Charlottesville residents, approximately <br />$420,000; and 4) 25% transient room tax set aside – dedicated to initiatives that preserve <br />and expand supportive housing opportunities for very low-income (under 30% AMI) <br />Charlottesville residents with special needs (elderly, disabled, homeless, etc.), <br />approximately $500,000. Mr. Tolbert reviewed proposed guidelines for evaluating <br />projects seeking CAHIP funds. He said the proposal does not restrict that CAHIP funds <br />necessarily be spent in the geographical limits of the City. He said that all CAHIP funds, <br />except CDBG/HOME/HOME match dollars would be managed by the Charlottesville <br />Area Community Foundation to open up the possibility of regional contributions to these <br />funds. Mr. Tolbert said that Council will have the ability to adjust CAHIP allocation <br />formulas in the future. Mr. Tolbert listed the decisions that Council needs to make as <br />follows about the proposal: 1) commit all CDBG and HOME dollars that are not <br />dedicated to administrative or social programs to this project for 10 years? 2) set aside <br />25% of transient room taxes? 3) dedicate the equivalent of one cent of the real property <br />tax to the fund; 4) using the Charlottesville Area Community Foundation to administer <br />the workforce housing dollars? And 5) direct HOME/CDBG dollars to CRHA? <br /> <br />Ms. Hamilton asked about the role of the Community Foundation and if it is <br />envisioned that there will be regional contributions. <br /> <br />Mr. Tolbert said the feeling was that the Foundation will be able to work with this <br />donor base as they are already managing workforce housing funds now. <br /> <br />Ms. Hamilton asked about the administrative costs, and Mr. Tolbert said he did <br />not know. <br /> <br />Mr. Taliaferro said that as he understands it, the funds would not have to be spent <br />in the City. He said he does not have a big problem with that, but he would like to see <br />people in the City taken care of. Mr. Taliaferro suggested that the County be approached <br />for matching funds. <br /> <br />Ms. Hamilton said she agrees that if funds are spent in the County then the <br />County ought to be contributing financially. <br /> <br />Mr. Taliaferro said housing is not a City only issue. <br /> <br />Mr. Tolbert said he can get more information on the amount of money the County <br />is spending on housing now. <br /> <br />Mr. O’Connell said that staff is in the process of evaluating budget proposals, and <br />said there are a lot of things to consider. He said one option is to phase the program in <br /> <br />