My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-06-02
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2008
>
2008-06-02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/12/2008 9:51:08 AM
Creation date
9/12/2008 9:51:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> statewide transportation revenue resources have declined, creating a <br />44% reduction in primary, urban and secondary funds; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS <br />, Governor Timothy M. Kaine has put forward a proposal to provide <br />equitable, sustainable streams of revenue for both statewide and regional transportation <br />needs; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS <br />, the Governor’s proposal is consistent with the Transportation <br />Vision for Charlottesville and our region; <br /> <br /> <br />WHEREAS <br />, the Governor’s proposal funds statewide maintenance needs, <br />allowing Transportation Trust fund monies to go towards new transit, multimodal and <br />roadway construction; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS <br />, the Governor’s proposal, transit and rail funding is increased by <br />over 30%, including a $60 million increase in transit funding; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS <br />, in the Governor’s proposal, an opportunity exists for a new revenue <br />source that could support a proposed Regional Transit Authority; <br /> <br /> <br />WHEREAS <br />, further delays in providing needed funding for transportation <br />infrastructure will lead to increased congestion, worsening air quality, reduced quality of <br />life, and endangers the economic vitality of our region and our Commonwealth, and does <br />not adequately address city transit alternatives; <br /> <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT <br />, the Charlottesville City <br />Council does hereby support the efforts of Governor Timothy M. Kaine to provide both <br />statewide and regional sources of transportation funding that will ensure safe roads, <br />alleviate congestion in the Charlottesville region and in the state’s urban centers, protect <br />and increase our transit investments, promote economic development statewide, and <br />provide for multimodal solutions to transportation crisis; and <br /> <br /> <br />BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT <br />, we urge the General Assembly to act <br />swiftly and decisively to approve legislation that will address the transportation-funding <br />crisis. <br /> <br /> BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT <br />, copies of this Resolution are forwarded <br />to the Governor, General Assembly leaders and our local General Assembly members. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION <br />: INITIATING PROCESS FOR HISTORIC DESIGNATION OF <br />BRANHAM-TIMBERLAKE PROPERTY <br /> <br /> Mr. Tolbert said that Woolen Mills neighbors have requested that the Branham- <br />Timberlake property be individually designated as historic. He said he does not have a <br />firm grasp on what happened with the property, except that the property was subdivided <br />in 1989 and a portion was individually designated as historic by Council in 1993. He <br />said the property was never shown as divided on City tax maps. He said that in 2003 <br />Council adopted a new zoning ordinance and a smaller parcel was picked up and <br />designated at that time. He said one option for Council is to designate the land in <br />question as individually protected, though there is some concern about this option <br />because it is vacant land and staff is sure what is significant about it to warrant such <br />designation. The other option is to designate a greater area of the Woolen Mills <br />neighborhood as an historic district at the completion of a survey. He noted that <br />designation either way does not stop development, but it will subject the property to <br />review by the Board of Architectural Review. <br /> <br /> Mr. Craig Brown, City Attorney, said the resolution before Council would initiate <br />a process to individually designate the property by first going to the BAR, then to the <br />Planning Commission for a joint public hearing with Council, and finally to Council for a <br />decision. Mr. Brown said the Zoning Administrator made a decision that only the parcel <br />with the house was protected, and residents unsuccessfully argued against the decision <br />before the Board of Zoning Appeals, then took the matter to court. He said there is <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.