Laserfiche WebLink
9 <br />WHEREAS <br /> , this Council has considered all suggested alternatives to the <br />proposed plan, with due consideration to the financial and environmental consequences <br />of the proposed plan and the possible alternatives that would meet the community’s <br />potable water needs for the next 50 years. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED <br /> by the Council for the City of <br />Charlottesville that the local Water Supply Plan as proposed by the Rivanna Water and <br />Sewer Authority is hereby approved, with the following components: <br />? <br /> <br />A new dam at the Ragged Mountain Reservoir, at a spillway height 45 feet above <br />the existing lower dam spillway structure, at a preliminary estimated total project <br />cost of approximately $37,000,000; <br />? <br /> <br />A new 36 inch transmission pipeline from the South Fork Rivanna Reservoir to <br />the expanded Ragged Mountain Reservoir, at a preliminary estimated total <br />project cost of approximately $56,000,000, which pipeline will replace the 18 <br />inch pipeline from the Sugar Hollow Reservoir, constructed in 1927; <br />? <br /> <br />The complete replacement of the piping and pumping transmission system <br />between the Ragged Mountain Reservoir and the Observatory Water Treatment <br />Plant, at a preliminary estimated total project cost of approximately $12,000,000, <br />which will replace the two cast iron pipelines constructed in 1908 and 1949 and <br />the very aged Royal Pump Station; <br />? <br /> <br />A major overhaul of the Observatory Water Treatment Plant to advance public <br />health by providing state-of-the-art facilities that will increase the Plant’s rating <br />to 8 million gallons per day, at a preliminary estimated total project cost of <br />approximately $22,000,000; <br />? <br /> <br />The expansion of the capacity of the South Fork Rivanna Water Treatment Plant <br />to 16 million gallons per day, at a preliminary estimated total project cost of <br />approximately $9,000,000; and, <br />? <br /> <br />The expansion of the capacity of the Observatory Water Treatment Plant to 10 <br />million gallons per day, at a preliminary estimated total project cost of <br />approximately $6,000,000. <br /> <br /> BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED <br />that in addition to the specific elements of the <br />local Water Supply Plan endorsed and approved by this Resolution, the City Council <br />hereby requests the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority to undertake a study of the <br />South Fork Rivanna Reservoir and the viability and merits of maintenance dredging, <br />siltation prevention and any other appropriate initiatives that could maintain and enhance <br />the aquatic health and water quality of the South Fork Rivanna Reservoir, as a valuable <br />water resource for the long term future benefit of the community. The Council hereby <br />requests that Albemarle County, the Albemarle County Service Authority, the Rivanna <br />River Basin Commission and other affected regional partners formally express their <br />support of this study. <br /> <br /> BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED <br />that the City Council hereby agrees to increase <br />its efforts to promote water conservation and efficiency by City water consumers, and <br />commits to engage in an active dialogue with the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority, <br />the County of Albemarle, the Albemarle County Service Authority, the University of <br />Virginia and other key partners to develop stronger incentives and more effective <br />measures for the conservation of water throughout the region. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING/ORDINANCE <br />: UTILITY RATES <br /> <br /> Mr. Bernard Wray, Director of Finance, presented the rate and fee <br />recommendations as follows: average increase of 5% for water; average increase of 8.3% <br />for sewer; and increases in the water and sewer connection (facility) fees; and an average <br />increase of 5.3% for gas. He said the connection fees have traditionally been very low. <br />He said increasing the connection fees will keep the increases down for the other rates in <br />the future. <br /> <br /> Mr. Taliaferro asked what percentage of a reduction in water conservation triggers <br />a price increase, and Mr. Wray said that an increase is necessary with any reduction <br />because of fixed and increased costs to the City. He said the City breaks even with <br />utilities, it does not make a profit. <br /> <br />