8
<br />supply of potable water for the Charlottesville-Albemarle community for the next 50
<br />years; and,
<br />
<br />WHEREAS
<br />, since 2004 there have been 10 major well-attended public meetings
<br />on the alternatives for a local water supply plan; and,
<br />
<br />WHEREAS
<br />, during the consideration of alternative strategies a strong emphasis
<br />was placed on developing a water supply (1) that would meet the needs of the community
<br />for the next 50 years; (2) that would be within a watershed area locally controlled by
<br />Albemarle County; and (3) that would represent the least environmentally damaging,
<br />practicable alternative; and,
<br />
<br />WHEREAS
<br />, this process identified a new dam at the Ragged Mountain Reservoir
<br />as the best alternative to achieve the community’s stated goals and criteria; and,
<br />
<br />WHEREAS
<br />, the Ragged Mountain alternative provides for significant
<br />enhancement of the natural conditions in the Moormans River and optimizes the balance
<br />between human and natural needs within the South Fork Rivanna River basin; and,
<br />
<br />WHEREAS
<br />, while the Ragged Mountain alternative does result in the loss of
<br />additional forest adjacent to the reservoir, the alternative includes a mitigation plan that
<br />provides permanent riparian protection to 75,000 linear feet of streams in the South Fork
<br />Rivanna watershed, provides for 200 acres of new riparian forest and wildlife habitat,
<br />provides 142 acres of new water surface for additional lacustrine aquatic habitat and
<br />passive recreation, relocates and lengthens existing walking trails around the reservoir,
<br />and provides for four acres of new wetlands adjacent to the southeastern boundary of the
<br />City along Moores Creek; and,
<br />
<br />WHEREAS
<br />, the construction of a new Ragged Mountain dam would protect the
<br />public health, safety and welfare by fully correcting existing dam safety hazards with the
<br />lower and upper Ragged Mountain dams; and,
<br />
<br />WHEREAS
<br />, the Ragged Mountain alternative also provides that old and obsolete
<br />water supply and treatment infrastructure will be replaced or updated, and where
<br />necessary expanded, in order to provide continuously reliable service; and,
<br />
<br />WHEREAS
<br />, the expanded Ragged Mountain reservoir will allow for the
<br />replacement of the Sugar Hollow pipeline, which was built in 1927 and is prone to breaks
<br />
<br />and iron corrosion, with a new, shorter pipeline from a much larger watershed; and,
<br />WHEREAS
<br />, the concept of the water supply plan which focused on meeting the
<br />community’s need for capacity for the next 50 years through a larger Ragged Mountain
<br />dam and reservoir and a pipeline from the South Fork Rivanna reservoir was endorsed in
<br />2005 and supported at that time by the Rivanna Conservation Society, Piedmont
<br />Environmental Council, The Nature Conservancy, Advocates for Sustainable Albemarle
<br />Population, League of Women Voters Charlottesville/Albemarle, Southern
<br />Environmental Law Center, Citizens for Albemarle, and Friends of the Moorman’s River;
<br />and,
<br />
<br />WHEREAS
<br />, in June 2006 the Charlottesville City Council endorsed this
<br />preferred alternative, as did the Albemarle County Board of Supervisors, the Albemarle
<br />County Service Authority and the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority; and,
<br />
<br />WHEREAS
<br />, the Ragged Mountain alternative has been reviewed, approved and
<br />permitted by the Department of Environmental Quality of the Commonwealth of
<br />Virginia; and,
<br />
<br /> WHEREAS
<br />, on May 6, 2008 City Council held a work session devoted
<br />exclusively to presentations on the proposed water supply plan, followed by a public
<br />hearing at the regular City Council meeting on May 19, 2008, at which time interested
<br />members of the public provided additional input on the proposed local water supply plan;
<br />and,
<br />
<br />
<br />
|