1995-01-17 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

122 Mr. Toscano announced that a video of the orchestra's perfommnce in Chicago will be shown on public access television on January 19th. RESOLUTION: PROPOSED INTERCHANGE AT ROUTE 29 NORTH AND HYDRAULIC ROAD Mr. Satyendra Huja, Director of Community Development, stated that the Planning Commission, following a public hearing on January 10th, recommended that the proposal of the Hydraulic Road grade separated interchange not be further pursued at this time by the Virginia Department of Transportation since it is not in the best interest of the community for the following reasons: 1) It does not significantly deal with identified traffic problems. It devotes most of the right-of-way and improvements to through-traffic problems and it does not adequately deal with the local traffic needs of the community. 80% of the traffic on this route is local traffic. 2) It will have a significant adverse economic impact on adjacent businesses and properties in terms of limiting access to these properties and due to additional right-of-way acquisitions at this intersection. It will require U-turn movements at intersection to get to businesses on the other side of the intersection. 3) It will have significant adverse impact on the quality of the environment of the City because of the nature of the proposed development, which includes 25 feet depressed 29 North lanes with retaining walls. The nature of the proposed interchange design is not harmonious to the character of the community. 4) It will have a significant adverse impact on the utilities as they will have to be relocated and would cost a significant amount for such actions. 5) It will have an adverse impact due to noise and air pollution. 6) It will have an adverse impact on the response time on utility vehicles in the adjacent neighborhoods and businesses especially as it relates to public safety and emergency vehicles. 7) It will result in the eliminating of a large amount of improvements currently being made at the intersection and on 29 North. Mr. Huja added that the Planning Commission encourages cooperative planning with Albemarle County and the University of Virginia to improve regional transportation. Mr. Toscano explained that he had survey Councilors on the interchange issue and, as a result, developed a proposed resolution which he read. Ms. Daugherty made a motion to aplcn-ove the resolution and Mr. Vandever seconded the motion. Ms. Daugherty stated that she supports the resolution because of the extreme toss of businesses and revenue that the interchange would cause at one of the City's major business centers. Mr. Daugherty added that a lot of effort has been made to make entrances into the City attractive and she views the proposed interchange design as a huge, cold concrete structure. Mr. Vandever stated that the interchange design brings in all of the negatives of the previously proposed expressway design, which the City had opposed, without any of the benefits, such as the elimination of traffic lights. Mr. Vandever stated that he feels the Meadowcreek Parkway and Western Bypass, with the North Grounds connector road, need to be constructed. Mr. Vandever stated that he feels the interchange would be a disastrous design for the City and defies common sense. Ms. Slaughter stated that she feels the agreement between the City, County, and University of Virginia is important, but emphasized that at the time the agreement was made the projects were conceptual, and only now when details can been focused on, are the true impacts made apparent. Ms. Slaughter stated that she tNnks the proposed resolution addresses the special issues with which Councilors are concerned. Mt-. Toscano reviewed the process leading up to Council's consideration of the interchange at Hydraulic Road. A public session on the proposed interchanges was held by the Virginia Department of Transportation in the fall. As a result of this session, the public asked Council and the Planning Commission to study the issue. Mr. Toscano stated that the numbers and depth of opposition expressed, in both the public hearing and in calls and letters, many of which were from Albemarle County residents, was unexpected. Mr. Toscano noted