1994-08-15 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

31 continued that he thinks the safety issues can be addressed and pollution minimized by restricting the types of vehicles. Mr. Vandever stated that he thinks supporting the crossing is part of guaranteeing the mall's long-term success. Rev. Edwards stated that he appreciates the public's participation in the issue. Rev. Edwards stated that he thinks the mall needs a more comprehensive approach than just the mall crossing to be more successful, such as changing the name of the mall to something such as "Jefferson Village." Rev. Edwards stated that he would prefer to see the impact of two-waying Water Street as well as approval oftwo-waying Market Street before allowing the crossing. Rev. Edwards stated that he does not think development should drive the Comprehensive Plan, but the Comprehensive Plan should drive development, and while economic development is included in the Plan, crossing the mall is not. Rev. Edwards stated that he thinks the Comprehensive Plan should be amended if the mall crossing is allowed. Mr. Toscano stated that he realizes that people will disagree on how to best ensure the vitality of the mall, noting that the City has invested in the malt's success by retaining the Michie Company (and agreeing to build the access from the Michie Company to the mall, which was a "deal breaker" for that project), building the Water Street parking garage, making improvements on 3rd Street from the parking garage to the mall, improving signage, and two-waying Water Street. Mr. Toscano stated that private partners are needed to keep the mall and City vibrant and to help meet the many financial needs of the City. Mr. Toscano stated that it is the Councffs responsibility to strike a balance between maintaining the secure park-like aspect of the mall and improving the more tenuous retail environment of the mall. Mr. Toscano noted that it is expensive to maintaining the mall's infrastructure. Mr. Toscano stated that he did not think crossing the mall would be harmful to the park-like environment but would help the economics of the mall. Mr. Toscano stated that approval of the crossing was not a "done deal." Mr. Toscano stated that Council has heard the critics of the crossing who have raised important issues to be considered. Mr. Toscano added that allowing the crossing will create the opportunity for the theater and skating fink, but stressed that development by both of those projects will be done by the private sector. Ms. Daugherty made a motion to approve the resolution allowing vehicular crossing of the mall at 2nd Street and Ms. Slaughter seconded the motion. Mr. Vandever recommended that the sentence making the crossing subject to development of the theater be omitted and dealt with separately as a condition for approval. Ms. Daugherty and Ms. Slaughter accepted Mr. Vandever's amendment. The resolution was approved by the following vote. Ayes: Ms. Daughe~y, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Toscano, Mr. Vandever. Noes: Rev. Edwards. Ms. Slaughter made the following suggestions for conditions of allowing the crossing of the mall: 1) traffic should be one-way going north; 2) drop-offand pick-up of passengers should not be allowed on the mall, but on the side streets and the existing number of handicapped parking spaces should be maintained; 3) pedestrian crossing should be funneled to the middle of the mall; 4) the crossing should be allowed at all hours, but only to cars, not buses or trucks. Mr. Vandever stated that he would like to see JAUNT vans be able to cross the mall. Ms. Slaughter continued with recommended conditions: 5) the Board of Architectural Review should review all signs, street furniture and other items needed for crossing; 6) Council should review the crossing within a two-year time period. Ms. Slaughter stated that she thinks the cost of the crossing should be borne by the developer of the theater, noting that while the crossing will benefit the entire mall, it will directly benefit the theater. Ms. Slaughter requested that staff provide a recommendation regarding needed signalization and signs for the crossing. Ms. Daugherty stated that she would prefer to consider other cost sharing options, perhaps exploring having adjacent property owners share the cost for the crossing since she thinks the crossing is justified on its own regardless of the theater.