1994-09-21 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

93 Mr. Toscano stated that while he is concerned about the signal such development may send, the issues of concern, size and massing of the building are not within the Council's purview and, therefore, he feels Council should defer to the BAR's decision-making process. The decision of the Board of Architectural Review regarding development on 222 South Street was approved by the following vote. Ayes: Ms, Daugherty, Rev. Edwards, Mr. Toscano, Mr. Vandever. Noes: Ms. Slaughter. Mr. Toscano expressed sympathy to the Gilliam family on the death of Mr. Gilliam, and noted that the Crilliam family had requested that the matter not be deferred. PRESENTATION: THOMAS JEFFERSON PLANNING DISTRICT COMMISSION LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM Ms. Bonnie Fronfelter, legislative liaison with the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission, presented the Planning District's legislative program and asked Council for a good-faith approval ofthe document. Ms. Slaughter stated that she is hesitant to oppose changes in the Freedom of Information Act without further information, and Mr. Gouldman stated that he will attempt to find out more about what form the proposed legislation would take. Ms. Daugherty recommended that there be a statement of support for state tax incentives for manufacturers who use or recycle plastics, and it was the consensus of Council to include such a statement. Ms: Daugherty suggested adding a provision supporting funding for shelters and hotlines for abused women and victims of sexual assault, and it was the consensus of Council to include such a statement. Ms. Slaughter recommended that support for providing incentives to reuse tires be included rather than the current proposal to burn them, and it was the consensus of Council to include such a statement. Ms. Slaughter stated that she continues to be concerned about the proposals to reduce business and professional licenses, and Ms. Fronfeker noted that the Virginia Chamber of Commerce has been very vocal against this tax. Mr. Toscano asked Ms. Fronfelter to alert appropriate City officials if the business and professional license issue comes up. Mr. Toscano added that opposition to the proposed change could be expressed through the Urban Partnership. On motion by Mr. Slaughter, seconded by Rev. Edwards, the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission's legislative program was unanimously approved, with the addition agreed to above. REPORT: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Mr. Huja stated that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Economic Development Strategy with the following comments: 1) Art Community: The strategy needs to acknowledge the importance of the art community to economic development, especially tourism. 2) Executive Summary: The Executive Summary needs to outline the process and future steps for this plan. 3) Counseling, Education and Training: Charlottesville has had significant growth in jobs, most of those jobs were taken by people who do not live in Charlottesville. The Plan needs to emphasize the importance of counseling, education and training community residents so that they can take advantage of job opportunities. The City should encourage non-traditional employment opportunities. 4) Events Coordinator: This position should not be on City staff. The City should explore working on this issue with Charlottesville Downtown Foundation. 5) Specific Goals and Objectives: The community, especially the Economic Development Committee, needs to