My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1994-06-06
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1994
>
1994-06-06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2001 8:43:00 PM
Creation date
11/16/2001 3:41:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
6/6/1994
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
288 <br /> <br />would mean a loss of property value for her. Ms. Snfith stated that she felt changing the <br />Land Use designation as proposed would seem to be an arbitrary and unwise action. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ashlin Smith, 620 Park Street and Vice President of Preservation Piedmont, <br />stated that she supported changing the Land Use to residential and felt it made economic <br />sense to maintain the downtown residential areas. <br /> <br /> Ms. Nancy Long, 509 Lexington Avenue, supported changing the Land Use Plan, <br />adding that it using such property for commercial property in the central city area would be <br />an inefficient use of land. <br /> <br /> Mr. Kevin Lynch, 609 Locust Avenue, stated that he was concerned about hospital <br />sprawl into the residential neighborhood and supported designating Grove Avenue as <br />residential. <br /> Mr. Joseph Berry, 509 Lexington Avenue, supported changing the Land Use Plan. <br /> <br />As there were no further speakers the public hearing was closed. <br /> <br />ORDINANCE: AMENDING LAND USE PLAN FOR GROVE AVENUE FROM <br />OFFICE TO P~SIDENTtAL <br /> <br /> Ms. Slaughter stated that the vote was split 3 - 2 on Council in 1990, with the <br />majority deciding that the Land Use Plan for Grove Avenue should remain office in the long <br />term. When the rezoning request for one property on Grove Avenue came before Council <br />last year there was a change on Council that the City should take a more pro-active stance in <br />protecting the neighborhood and in looking to the future and that the Land Use Plan and the <br />existing zoning should be the same and therefore she supported changing the Land Use Plan <br />to residential because these properties are historical, their architecture is unique and that a <br />goal of the City is to preserve residential neighborhoods. <br /> <br /> On motion by Ms. Slaughter, seconded by Ms. Daugherty, the ordinance entitled "AN <br />ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE LAND USE PLAN OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN <br />BY C HANGING THE DESIGNATION OF THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 504, 505, <br />506, 521 AND 525 GROVE AVENUE FROM OFFICE TO RESIDENTIAL" was offered <br />and carried over to the next meeting for consideration. <br /> <br /> Ms. Daugherty stated that while she felt the Martha Jefferson Hospital Plan was a <br />good plan, it does not mean that conditions do not change. Ms. Daugherty stated that she <br />felt it was important to preserve housing in the City and she felt sufficient business areas exist <br />in other parts of the City. Ms. Daugherty stated that if the Land Use Plan is not amended <br />then the Council will be unable to refuse future zoning requests on Grove Avenue. <br /> <br />PUBLIC llEARING: WlLLARD DRIVE DRAINAGE ASSESSMENTS <br /> <br /> Mr. Gary O'Connell, Deputy City Manager, explained that work has been completed <br />on drainage improvements on Willard Drive and final assessments made and the public <br />heating is being held as required. <br /> <br /> The public heating was opened but as there ~vere no speakers the public heating was <br />closed. <br /> <br />ORI)INANCE: WILLARD DRIVE D~AGE ASSESSi~'IENTS <br /> <br /> On motion by Ms. Daugherty, seconded by Mr. Toscano, the ordinance entitled "AN <br />ORDINANCE AFFIRMING THE CREATION OF A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT <br />DISTRICT PURSUANT TO VIRGINIA CODE SECTION 15.1-239, et seq., <br />ESTABLISHING THE PORTION OF PROJECT COSTS TO BE LEVIED AS AN <br />ASSESSMENT ON THE PROPERTIES IN SUCH DISTRICT; RECITING THE <br />FINDINGS OF CITY COUNCIL IN REGARD TO THE BENEFITS ACCRUING TO <br />PROPERTIES WITHIN SAID DISTRICT; ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF THE <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.