My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000_Resolutions
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Ords Res App
>
Resolutions 1976-2009
>
2000_Resolutions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2024 4:09:35 PM
Creation date
3/30/2015 2:47:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Attorney
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
from the County of Albemarle and the City of Charlottesville, dated January 10, 1991 of record <br />• in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Albemarle County, Virginia in Deed Book 1137, <br />page 630. This parcel represents the land that is included under Solid Waste Permit No. 125 <br />issued to the Rivanna Solid Waste Authority by DEQ, commonly known as the ivy landfill, at <br />the time that this Action was filed. <br />F. "Rivanna Solid Waste Authority" or "RSWA" means a public service authority <br />created by the County of Albemarle and the City of Charlottesville pursuant to the predecessor of <br />the Virginia Water and Waste Authorities Act, Va. Code Section 15.2-5100, et seq., and a <br />certificate of incorporation issued by the Virginia State Corporation Commission, and its <br />successors and assigns. <br />RECITALS <br />WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs, along with David W. and Maureen T. Booth (the "Booth <br />• Plaintiffs") and Edwin Strange and Pamela Strange (the "Stranges"), Gertrude and Michael <br />• <br />Weber (the "Webers"), filed this Action on November 18, 1998, seeking declaratory relief, <br />injunctive relief, civil penalties, and attorneys fees against some or all of the Defendants under <br />the citizen suit provisions of a variety of federal statutes including the federal Resource <br />Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA"), 42 U.S.C. § 6901, et seq., the federal Clean Water <br />Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and <br />Liability Act ("CERCLA"), 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq., and some of the Plaintiffs, specifically <br />Laurice Batton and Rebecca Batton, as well as the Stranges, the Webers, and the Booth <br />Plaintiffs, also sought recovery of monetary damages under various theories of common law, <br />including public and private nuisance, trespass, negligence, and inverse condemnation, all <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.