2000_Resolutions - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

pending the outcome of the dispute. If the RSWA succeeds in demonstrating that the detected • contamination did not come from the Ivy landfill, then the Peacock Hill Service Company shall assign to the RSWA and subrogate any rights to which the Peacock Hill Service Company may be entitled for any recovery for the expenses of the temporary water supply obtained by settlement or judgment from the party responsible for the contamination of the Peacock Hill Service Company water supply. In addition, the RSWA will analyze groundwater samples (prior to treatment) obtained from the Peacock Hill drinking water system/well(s) upon which the treatment device(s) have been installed, for the contaminants listed on Exhibit 4 once each calendar month for a period of one year. If during said year, a verified detection of any of the contaminant(s) listed on Exhibit 4 is detected in the Peacock Hill drinking water system/well(s) upon which the filtration devices have been installed, sampled prior to entering the treatment system, at a concentration greater than 75% of the MCLS or ACLS established for the • contaminant, temporary safe potable water will be supplied as soon as reasonably possible to the Peacock Hill resident(s) who utilize the affected Peacock Hill drinking water system/well(s) at the same cost to the residents that they paid to the Peacock Hill Service Company until a more • permanent solution can be provided. The precise means by which a permanent safe potable water will be supplied to the affected Peacock Hill resident(s) shall be developed after consultation among the appropriate water supply engineering, hydrogeologic and/or other technical experts retained by Peacock Hill and the Defendants with the ultimate solution subject to approval by the Board of Supervisors of Albemarle County. 5. Dispute Resolution Mechanism with Respect to Groundwater Issues. For any decisions under this Agreement with respect to which the hydrogeology consultant(s) for the RSWA and the hydrogeology consultant(s) for the Plaintiffs are unable to 24