Laserfiche WebLink
approved by Council. <br /> <br /> BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of <br />Charlottesville, that the Mayor is hereby authorized to <br />execute on behalf of the City the following document, in <br />form approved by the City Attorney: <br /> <br />An agreement among C,G.V. Incorporated, Trailways <br />Lines, Inc., and the City of Charlottesville in <br />connection with the lease of land on the corner of <br />Sixth Street and Levy Avenue. <br /> <br /> A copy of such document shall be kept on file with <br />the minutes of the Council meeting at which this <br />resolution was adopted. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION: AUTHORIZING MAYOR TO SIGN AGREEMENT WITH HOUSING <br />AUTHORITY RE: PROPERTY AT 6TH STREET AND LEVY AVENUE <br /> <br /> Mr. Hendrix stated that this was a companion <br />resolution with the previous one, regarding leasing of the <br />property for the parking of the Trailways buses. <br /> <br /> On motion by Dr. Hall, seconded by Mrs. Gleason, the <br />resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign an agreement with <br />the Housing Authority re: property at 6th Street and Levy <br />AVenue was unanimously approved by Council. <br /> <br /> BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of <br />Charlottesville, that the Mayor is hereby authorized to <br />execute on behalf of the City the following document, in <br />form approved by the City Attorney: <br /> <br />A lease between the Charlottesville Redevelopment and <br />Housing Authority and the City of Charlottesville for <br />property at the corner of Sixth Street and Levy <br />Avenue. <br /> <br /> A copy of such document shall be kept on file with <br />the minutes of the'Council meeting at which this <br />resolution was adopted, <br /> <br />ORDINANCE: REZONING PROPERTY AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF HARRIS <br />ROAD AND 5TH STREET, S.W. FROM R-2 TO B-2 <br /> <br /> Mr. Barnes stated that he would abstain from <br />discussion of the rezoning due to a conflict of interest. <br /> <br /> Mr. Huja stated that the Planning Commission <br />recommended denial of the rezoning for the following <br />reasons: 1) It is contrary to the Land Use Plan of the <br />Comprehensive Plan, 2) The rezoning could set an <br />unacceptable precedent for further rezoning requests north <br />of Harris Road, encroaching into the residential area, and <br />3) Sufficient commercial zoned land exists in the area to <br />accommodate the proposed use. <br /> <br /> Dr. Charles Hurt, owner of the property, stated that <br />he felt there was no practical residential use of the <br />property and felt the property was well suited for a bank <br />which was the use intended. <br /> <br /> Mr. Buck stated that he was concerned that rezoning <br />the property would cause others to request that the <br />property to the north be rezoned also. <br /> <br /> Dr. Hurt stated that he owned the property to the <br />north and he was willing to restrict it to prevent <br />rezoning. <br /> <br /> Mr. Don Bent, an employee of Dr. Hurt, stated that <br />if the property is not rezoned then it will most likely <br />not be used. <br /> <br /> <br />