Laserfiche WebLink
166 <br /> <br /> Responding to a question from Mr. Toscano, Ms, Scott said that the guideline is to <br />keep the debt service under 8%. <br /> <br /> The public hearing was opened, but as there were no speakers, the public hearing was <br />closed. <br /> <br /> Responding to a question from Ms. Richards about the amount in the ordinance versus <br />the amount in the capital improvement budget for Washington Park, Ms. Peacock said that it <br />anticipates a commitment to allocate a contingency of $200,000 for next year. <br /> <br /> On motion by Ms. Daugherty, seconded by Mr. Toscano, the ordinance entitled "AN <br />ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF NOT TO EXCEED <br />TWENTY-FOUR MII;LION DOLLARS ($24,000,000) PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF <br />GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, <br />VIRGINIA, CONSISTING OF TEN MILLION DOLLARS ($10,000,000) PRINCIPAL <br />AMOUNT OF GENERAL OBLIGATION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT BONDS TO BE <br />ISSUED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING FUNDS TO PAY THE COST OF <br />VARIOUS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS OF AND FOR THE CITY AND NOT <br />TO EXCEED FOURTEEN- MILLION DOLLARS ($14,000,000) PRINCIPAL AMOUNT <br />OF GENERAL OBLIGATION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT REFUNDING BONDS TO BE <br />ISSUED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING FUNDS TO REFUND IN ADVANCE OF <br />THEIR STATED MATURITIES AND REDEEM CERTAIN OUTSTANDING GENERAL <br />OBLIGATION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF THE CITY; FIXING THE FORM, <br />DENOMINATION AND CERTAIN OTHER FEATURES OF SUCH BONDS; <br />PROVIDING FOR THE SALE OF SUCH BONDS AND DELEGATING TO THE CITY <br />MANAGER CERTAIN POWERS WITH RESPECT TO THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF <br />SUCH GENERAL OBLIGATION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT BONDS; AUTHORIZING <br />THE APPOINTMENT OF AN ESCROW AGENT; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION <br />AND DELIVERY OF AN ESCROW DEPOSIT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE <br />CITY AND SUCH ESCROW AGENT AND THE PURCHASE OF THE SECURITIES TO <br />BE HELD THEREUNDER; AND AUTHORIZING THE DESIGNATION OF THE <br />REFUNDED BONDS FOR REDEMPTION" was offered and carried over to the next <br />meeting for consideration. <br /> <br />ORDINANCE: CLOSING AN ALLEY AT END OF 15TH STREET, S.W. <br /> <br /> Mr. Gouldman explained that the alley closing was requested by the University to clear <br />up a title problem and reserves a utility easement. Mr. Gouldman said that the Planning <br />Commission recommended that the University pay the City fair market price for the alley, but <br />there is a question about whether the City has any interest in the alley at all, and he does not <br />recommend that a charge be made to the University. Mr. Gouldman noted that the City's <br />policy about alley and street closings provides that payment can be sought, but the Council <br />has only done so on one or two occasions. <br /> <br /> On motion by Ms. Daugherty, seconded by Mr, Toscano, the ordinance entitled "AN <br />ORDINANCE CLOSING, VACATING AND DISCONTINUING AN ALLEY OFF 15TH <br />STREET, S.W.," without the requirement for payment, was offered and carried over to the <br />next meeting for consideration. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION: AMENDING JAIL AUTHORITY AGREElVIENT <br /> <br /> Mr. O'Connell explained that the changes in the Jail Authority agreement have been <br />recommended in order to get the best interest rates when the Authority issues bonds for the <br />jail expansion. <br /> <br /> Mr. Gouldman said that the changes provide a debt sen, ice payment guarantee, change <br />the payment dates, and provide for the possibility of another locality joining the Authority in <br />the future. <br /> <br />Ms. Richards noted that the Jail Authority has not discussed the amendments. <br /> <br /> <br />