1998-09-08 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

269 Ms. Heule said that public housing residents have more knowledge about public housing than others and Councilors haven't experienced life in public housing. Ms. Heule said that public housing residents have faith in the spirit of its own people and stand by the right of people to govern themselves. Mr. Cox expressed concern that no public comment ,,vas allowed in the work session and onlY one person has been allowed to speak about the composition. Ms. Daugherty noted that Councilors have heard many times from many people who are in attendance at the meeting, and stressed that she hopes to involve those interested in the focus groups to be formed. Ms. Daugherty said that the proposed interim board would include three Councilors, one representative from the community at large and one resident of public housing for a limited period of time. Ms. Daugherty said that she thinks this proposal is a good idea and encouraged resident participation. Mr. Toscano said that two issues have been raised about governance on the Housing Authority Board: 1) training residents in the way the Housing Authority works and 2) how to involve residents in the critical short-term issue of hiring a director. Mr. Toscano recommended that the Housing Authority find money to provide training sessions for residents and that there be broad representative from public housing residents on the interview panel for the director. Ms. Daugherty said she would like to recruit communky members to help plan the focus groups. Ms. Richards said she would be interested in finding out from other Housing Authority boards how they choose members or the mechanism they use for tenants to make choices regarding representation. Ms. Richards said she is also interested in training for all boards. Ms. Richards said she does not want to see public housing representation diminished, but there are a number of issues now and a plan needs to be mapped out for the future. Ms. Richards said she is interested in investigating tenant management. Ms. Richards noted that a recent survey of Housing Authorities in Virginia showed that there are only a few resident members. Ms. Richards said that while she does not view conflict of interest by residents to be a serious concern, it was brought to Council's attention by a citizen and that question should be resolved. Mr. Caravati said that Council could consider holding a limited public hearing before the second reading of the ordinance. Mr. Cox said that the issue could be taken off the agenda and a public hearing be held before the next meeting. Mr. Cox said that Council has nothing to gain but anger of public housing residents and their disenfranchisement if it moves forward without public comment. Mr. Cox made a motion to remove the item from the agenda and hold a public hearing at the next meeting. Mr. Cox's motion died for lack of a second. Mr. Toscano said that he is disturbed that no Councilor raised the issue of a public hearing before now and is concerned that people were given the impression they would be allowed to speak. Mr. Toscano said that he would support a public hearing before the second reading. Mr. Toscano made a motion to approve the ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REORDAINING SECTION 2-37 OF ARTICLE II OF CHAPTER 2 OF THE CODE OTHE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, 2990, AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CHARLOTTESVILLE REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY," with a sunset date of June 30, t999. Ms. Richards seconded the motion. Mr. Caravati said that he feels a sense of urgency and would prefer an earlier sunset date.