1999-03-01 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

58 Mr. Ron Higgins, Acting Director of Community Development, noted that if any part ora building is visible in a design control district, the design of the entire building is considered in the review process. Mr. Higgins said that if a building in a design control district is not visible, it could be demolished. Mr. Cox said that a design control district designation helps to assure that the integrity of the street is maintained, that historic properties are not demolished, and to assure that renovations and new construction are appropriate. Responding to a question from Mr. Toscano, Mr. Higgins said that designation as a design control district does not change the underlying zoning or height restriction. Mr. Caravati asked if staff has talked to property owners, and Mr. Higgins said that a forum was held at University Baptist Church with property owners. The owners feel that they have done a good job preserving the area and do not feel that they need help from the City with the historic designation, Mr. Higgins said that none of the main property owners support the designation. Ms. Richards said she sees the primary rationale for the design control district to protect beautiful old homes, though she noted that most in this proposed district have been renovated and listed on the federal historic register. Ms. Richards expressed concern that the City might be requiring replication of the federal or state review process in those cases where owners have chosen to go through that process, and suggested that Council might want to examine whether it wants to require people who go through the federal or state process to go through the City's process as well. Ms. Richards suggested studying the possibility of exempting from the BAR review process those who have applied for and are certified for federal tax credits for historic renovations. Ms. Richards said she feels requiring replication of the review process places an extra burden on property owners Mr. Higgins said that the federal review is an extensive interior and exterior review and very few have taken tax credits for that reason. Ms. Daugherty said she would like to move ahead with the ordinance before Council tonight to prevent demolitions~ She expressed interest in Ms. Richard's suggestion, but said she would like to study the matter and would be open to amending the ordinance at a later date. Ms. Richards requested that staff prepare a report or recommendations about possible exemptions for those who receive federal tax credits for historic renovations for Council, including legal issues, that would apply to all historic districts. Mr. Gouldman noted that such an ordinance amendment would have to go through the normal Planning Commission process. Mr. Cox made a motion to approve the ordinances, and Ms. Daugherty seconded the motion. Mr. Caravati said that he would like to pursue Ms. Richard's suggestion. Mr. Caravati said he is bothered by two things: the exclusion of the lot on the corner.of l0th and Wertland and the fact that this would be the first design control district passed over the objection of the property owners. Ms. Daugherty said that the property owners have worked without the supervision from the City and do not like the idea of additional supervision, but she feels it is incumbent on the City to protect the area. Mr. Toscano said he would like to hear the rationale for including buildings that are in the rear of parcels, but are ugly. Mr. Toscano said it is a difficuk issue trying to determine what the appropriate architecture is for the street. Mr. Toscano said one idea to consider might be to draw a line that would protect the historic structures, on.the street, but would not control the buildings in the rear, but added that there is the risk of buildings