Laserfiche WebLink
I85 <br /> <br /> Mr. Toscano noted that a County resident holding a Section 8 voucher could <br />move into the housing. <br /> <br /> tvLs. Richards said she likes flexibility built in, but .agrees with Mr. Toscano, and <br />suggested that a stipulation be added "pro~ded that such development is not in conflict <br />with the Council's Housing Strategy or economic development plan." Councilors agreed <br />with Ms. Richards' suggested language. <br /> <br /> Mr. Toscano said he is struggling with whether the period of time that the City <br />could exercise its option should be shortened to three years. <br /> <br /> Mr. Armstrong said three years may be too short a period of time to get <br />comprehensive community input, get a developer and secure funding. <br /> <br /> Mr. Caravafi said that even welt funded private development projects can take <br />two to three years, and said he feels a five year period is reasonable. <br /> <br />Ms. Daugherty agreed with five years. <br /> <br /> Ms. Richards suggested that the project could be benclunarked in a more refined <br />way, allowing three years for design-and approval, and an additional two years for <br />construction. <br /> <br /> Mr. Kirtley said he guarantees that PHA wilI move forward as quickly as <br />possible, and said that he feels only external sources could slow the project down. <br /> <br /> Mr~ Toscano said he is only concerned because City funds wilt be:invested in the <br />project, but said he can live with the four years and six months as included in the <br />contract. <br /> <br /> Mr. Toscano, referring to the resolution approving a grant application for PHA <br />later in the meeting, asked what happens to the $30,000 for demolition if the grant comes <br />through. <br /> <br /> Mr, Armstrong said that the gram money can be used for acquisition and other <br />purposes. <br /> <br /> Ms. Richards made a motion to approve the resolution authorizing housing <br />initiatives funds for purchase of property- at 9~/t0~ Street by Piedmont Housing <br />Alliance, with the contract amended by Council. Mr, Caravati seconded the motiorL <br /> <br /> Mr. Toscano clarified that the phrase "termination for any mason" remains in the <br />contract. <br /> <br /> The resolution was approved by the following vote. Ayes: Mr. Caravati, Ms. <br />Daugherty, Ms. Richards, Mr. Toscano. Noes: None. Absent: Mr. Cox. <br /> <br /> BE IT RESOLVED that the City Manager is authorized to execute the contract <br />between the City and Piedmont Housing Alliance dated August t, I999, which document <br />is incorporated herein by reference, and which should result in an important <br />redevelopment project for the 9th -10th Street Confdor; and- <br /> <br /> BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City's monetary obligations under said <br />contract shall be taken from the Housing Initiatives Account of the Capital Fund. <br /> <br /> Mr. Armstrong said that three of the four houses on tlinton Avenue have been <br />sold and the project is having a real impact on the street. <br /> <br /> Mr. Toscano asked staff to compile data to show the impact such investments can <br />have. <br /> <br /> <br />