1999-09-07 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

198 Responding to a question from Ms. Richards about environmental issues, Mr. Tatum said he has not gotten to the stage and it would be addressed as part of the site plan process. Mr. Tatum said he may build infiltration trenches to keep water on the site. Mr. Cox asked if Mr. Tatum thinks that the City should make parkland available for development. Mr. Tatum said he thinks of this proposal as an opportunity to gain parkland and meet the need for new housing. Mr. Tatum said he thinks the larger issue of develOping parkland-should be left for Council to decide. Responding to a question from Ms. Daugherty, Mr. Tatum said the parkland that would be acquired adjacent to Riverview Park is in the floodplain. Mr. Tatum said he thinks it would be desirable to have this property under City control-as the City would gain 1200 feet of river edge. Mr. Tatum said the City now has a 15 foot wide easement through this property. Mr. Cox said he thinks it is curious that parktandis zones R-1 and fee!sthis should be corrected. Mr. Huja said that all property was designated with some zoning when the zoning map was originally adopted in I958 and R-1 was the lowest category at that time. Mr. Huja said a new zoning designation could be created for parks. Mr. Toscano suggested that the Planning Commission look at this issue in the upcoming Comprehensive Plan review. Ms. Richards said she agrees that the zoning for parks needs to be revised, Responding to questions, Mr. Tatum said that VDOT uses anaverage of 7 trips per day per house for new traffic generated by a development. Mr. Tatum said he does not think that this development will change the traffic rating on Locust Avenue. Ms. Richards said that the responsibility falls onCouncil a~nd staff that there was no public process prior to this time, and added that she did not hear such a suggestion by Councilors during deliberations with the developer. Ms, Richards said that at the time the issue was being deliberated, the property in question seemed to be remote. Ms, Richards said she does not place the responsibility for a public process on Mr. Tatunfs shoulders. Mr. Cox said that when Mr. Tatum first brought the issue to Council a PUD was discussed, but the developer did not want to pursue this. Mr. Cox said he continues to believe that a public participatory process would have gotten supporters for the project. Ms. Richards said she is personally concerned about the issue of stewardship of the land. Ms. Richards said there is value to infitt development and it should be pursued whether or not this is the right location. Ms. Richards said she- has difficulty in maintaining pubIic property for the benefit-of a few, and if this project is not approved, she feels the accessibility and usability of this land must be improved for the public at large. Ms. Richards said she is concerned with the precedent of selling parkland, though she does notjsee it as a policy decision that Council has made. Ms, Richards expressed concern about the discord the proposal has created in the community and about questions of credibility of Mr. Tatum. Ms. Richard said Mr. Tatum put in many years of public service and always removed himself when conflicts arose, often at the expense of his professional career_ Ms. Richards said she would like to see theptedge of the property owners for an easement to the land developed, perhaps with a restrictive covenant which would also obligate them to maintain the easement. Ms. Richards said she thinks the development is well designed and will be beneficial to the community. Ms. Richards made a motion to approve the ordinance authorizing the exchange of land. Ms, Daugherty seconded the motion and the ordinance was carried over to the next meeting for consideration.