Laserfiche WebLink
283 <br /> <br /> Mr. Cox said he appreciates the battle that Mr. Heller is fighting, and said he feels <br />it is a long-term battle. <br /> <br /> Ms. Richards agreed with Mr. Cox, and said the state has nothing to be proud of <br />in its current system, and she hopes society will revisit the death penalty. <br /> <br />a. Minutes of January 3, 2000 <br /> <br />b. RESOLUTION: <br /> <br />Supporting Moratorium on Death Penalty <br /> <br /> WltEREAS the Commonwealth of Virginia Fas executed more people per capita <br />than any other state with populations over one million, and is second only to the state of <br />Texas in the total number of executions carried out since reinstatement of the death <br />penalty in 1976. <br /> <br /> WltEREAS the Corranonwealth of Vkginia denies those convicted of capital <br />crimes full exercise of due process by implementing the following procedural rules: <br /> <br /> The "21-Day Rule," which does not permit a court to review any newly discovered <br />evidence of innocence after 21 days have elapsed from the time of sentencing. <br /> <br /> The "Contemporaneous Objection Rule," which does not permit objections to be made <br />in appeals if they were not made in the original trial. <br /> <br /> WItEREAS the Commonwealth of Virginia does not require that evidence be <br />preserved so that it may be presented in appeal proceedings. <br /> <br /> WItEP~AS prisoner appeals have been severely curtailed, increasing the risk of <br />imprisonment and execution of innocent people. <br /> <br /> In a series of rulings since 1991, the Supreme Court has drastically restricted the rights <br />of death row prisoners to appeal their convictions and death sentences in federal courts, <br />even in cases where prisoners present compelling evidence of innocence. In 1996, new <br />legislation drastically limited federal court review of death penalty appeals and <br />eliminated public funding of legal aid services for death row prisoners. <br /> <br /> WItER. EAS Virginia has the lowest reversal rate of death sentences on direct <br />appeal in the country (6 percent). The Virginia Supreme Court has never reversed a <br />death sentence under its mandatory review for proportionality. This review requires that <br />it compare the nature of the murder with similar cases resulting in a life sentence. <br /> <br /> The Virg~a Supreme Court has never granted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus- a <br />constitutional safeguard which allows for a challenge to the legitimacy (lawfulness) of a <br />conviction or death sentence. Nationally, 40% of persons condemned to death receive <br />reversals. <br /> <br /> WltEREAS the Comrnonwealth of Virginia has executed those who were <br />diagnosed as mentally ill or retarded and those who were under the age of 18 at the time <br />of their offenses. <br /> <br /> Wh~EREAS there is ample evidence that the death penalty is applied in a racist <br />manner: <br /> <br /> In 1987, in McCleskey v. Kemp, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to act on data <br />demonstrating the continuing reality of racial bias. In 1990, the U.S. General Accounting <br />Office reported "a pattern of evidence indicating racial disparities in charging, sentencing <br />and imposition of the death penalty." <br /> <br /> Nationwide, 82% of those put to death had been convicted of murdering a white person <br />even though people of color are the victims in more than half of all homicides. In <br />Virginia, only one white person has been executed for Irdlling a person of color. The U.S. <br />Congress has failed repeatedly to pass the Racial Justice Act which would allow <br /> <br /> <br />