My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-12-04
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000
>
2000-12-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2002 4:50:30 PM
Creation date
8/16/2002 3:22:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
12/4/2000
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
248 <br /> <br />to discuss three issues regarding parking: 1) parking principles to guide future parking <br />decisions, particularly new parking; 2) increasing parking fines in order to make better <br />use of on-street parking; and 3) reduce on-street parking limits from two hours to 1 1/2 <br />hours. <br /> <br /> Mr. Affl~rey Watts, Director of Economic Development, explained that the <br />guiding principles grew out of the parking study. The proposed principles are as follows: <br />1) The parking master plan clearly defines a significant deficit both in calculated demand <br />and needed parking at the present time within the downtown area of the City of <br />Charlottesville. The Council recognizes this deficit, its impacts upon the adjacent <br />neighborhoods and economic development vitality, and the need to reduce it in the <br />immediate furore. 2) The City has an appropriate and significant role to play in <br />addressing parking issues. This role includes appropriate efforts to assist in the financing <br />of parking structures, and addressing zoning, regulation and administration of our parking <br />assets. 3) The City needs to focus its time and attention immediately on two sites: one <br />in the western business corridor of our downtown area and the other in the eastern portion <br />of our downtown area. The eastern site should address some of the issues associated with <br />the Court Facility Study. 4) Future parking decks should be designed and coordinated <br />with mixed use development and, to the extent possible, the City should encourage <br />public/private development of the parking. 5) The capital costs associated with parking <br />is significant and the City has an important role in the funding of this infrastructure <br />requirement. 6) In order to meet funding requirements, it will be necessary for the City <br />to use a mix of various types of funding including City capital funds and debt financing <br />to meet the capital requirements. 7) The Council is open to the examination of potential <br />sites for parking development and will consider sites based upon their efficiency, cost and <br />compliance with the principles of the City Comprehensive Plan and recently completed <br />Corridor Study. Mr. Watts said that the principles will proVide guidance to staff. <br /> <br />Mr. Cox asked why there is no mention of underground parking in the principles. <br /> <br /> Mr. Watts proposed the following language regarding underground parking: <br />a) To the extent possible, maximize the natural topography of the site with the proposed <br />structure, b) Carefully evaluate the economic feasibility from a cost benefit standpoint, <br />short and long term. Be mindful of the environmental consideration associated with <br />underground parking primarily relating to the air circulation and exhaust, d) Care needs <br />to be taken to make the facility as user friendly as possible to patrons who are not <br />familiar with these types of structures, e) There should be careful attention to safety and <br />safety enhancements which make people more comfortable, f) The management of these <br />facilities should take into consideration techniques such as making short term limited <br />parking available on the upper floors and long-term employee parking on the lower <br />levels, g) Consider the uses of any technology advances in parking that may be <br />appropriate in order to gain maximum efficiency of space. <br /> <br /> Responding to a question from Ms. Richards, Mr. Watts said that the ordinance <br />regarding exempt parking in the central business district is recommended to be changed <br />in order to make it fair but not overly burdensome. <br /> <br /> Mr. Cox said that he feels the spirit of principle #4 should go beyond that and <br />retail should be encouraged on the street level. <br /> <br />Mr. Watts said the intent was to follow the Corridor Study. <br /> <br />Mr. Cox said there is more specificity in the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch said he agrees with most principles but while he thinks it is absolutely <br />essential t° encourage parking, he does not think the City can continue the current <br />subsidy in the long-term. <br /> <br /> Mr. Watts said "to the extent possible" was added because there may be situations <br />where the City and County would build a garage. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.