My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-12-06(II)
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000
>
2000-12-06(II)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2002 4:50:30 PM
Creation date
8/16/2002 3:24:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
12/6/2000
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
266 <br /> <br /> Finally, if there are questions that VDOT has about Council's position as stated in <br />this letter, please let us know, through contact with City staff or with me. We stand ready <br />to cooperate with VDOT in moving this project from the proverbial drawing board to <br />construction. <br /> <br />Sincerely yours, <br /> <br />J. Blake Caravati <br />Mayor <br /> <br />CC.' <br /> <br />Donald R. Askew, District Administrator, Culpeper <br />Carter Myers <br />Board of Supervisors <br /> <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />Adjustments necessary to bring VDOT drawings into compliance with City Council=s <br />Directive to design according to the principles outlined in A Study of Roadway <br />Alternatives for the Meadow Creek Parkway in Mclntire Park, prepared by Rieley & <br />Associates for the City of Charlottesville, April 27, 1999: <br /> <br />Horizontal Alignment: <br /> <br />The horizontal alignment should closely match that shown for Alternative 2-U in the <br />Study of Roadway Alternatives. The points of intersection, delta angles, radii, spiral <br />lengths, and stationing are all shown in the report. In particular, a sequence of radial <br />curves, joined to tangents with spirals on each end, is an important aspect of the <br />horizontal alignment. The current alignment shows only circular curve alignment, with <br />reverse curves in two locations. This is not consistent with the approach discussed in the <br />Roadway Alternatives report. The horizontal alignment is to follow the path shown, <br />which is for the best fit of a two-lane roadway, rather than two lanes of an anticipated <br />four-lane roadway. Geometry should be shown as the centerline for a two-lane road, not <br />the centerline for a four-lane road with two-lanes off-set to one side from the center-line. <br /> <br />Vertical Profile: <br /> <br />The vertical profile should closely match that shown for Alternatives 2-U, 3-U, 4-U in the <br />same report. Lengths of vertical curves, gradients, and K values are listed in the report. <br /> <br />Coordination of Horizontal Alignment with Profile: <br /> <br />It is important that the horizontal and vertical components be coordinated and designed to <br />result in a three-dimensional alignment that is Ain phase.~ The profile in the Study of <br />Roadway Alternatives demonstrates this relationship by showing the lengths of the <br />horizontal curves on the vertical profile. This principle is discussed on page three and <br />shown on Figure A of the report. <br /> <br />Superelevation: <br /> <br />Superelevation should closely match that shown in the report. <br /> <br />Pavement Widening: <br /> <br />The roadway should be designed with 20-£oot standard pavement width (or its metric <br />equivalent), with widening of pavement on curves, in accordance with AASHTO and <br />VDOT widening criteria. The widening should be applied gradually through the length <br />of the spiral curves, and remain full width through the circular curve component of the <br />curve. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.