Laserfiche WebLink
188 <br /> <br /> (4.) As adopted in the Prior Resolutions, the~ <br />proceeds from the sale of the Property are to be used <br />for the purchase or lease of the necessary renovations <br />to the new mental health program facility of Region Ten. <br />Any excess proceeds from the sale of the Property, after <br />appl.ying them towards the purchase or lease of said new <br />facility, shall be added..~o the Region Ten Community <br />Services Board Special Projects Fund, provided that all <br />proceeds of the sale will go only to the purchase or <br />lease of alternative facilities and not to other projects. <br /> <br />.(5) This Resolution shall take effect immediately. <br /> <br />STAFF RZPORT: BRICKING OF SIDE STR~ZTS ON DOWNTOWN MALL <br /> <br /> Mr. Hendrix stated that a survey of 4th Street <br />property owners had been conducted to find out their <br />interest in having the street bricked. <br /> <br /> Mr. Satyendra Huja, Director of Community Development, <br />stated that all but one property owner had been ~contacted, <br />and of those, all but one were in favor of bricking 4th <br />Street. Mr. Huja stated that the Planning Commission <br />recommended criteria for prioritizing the bricking of <br />side streets and also recommended priorities. The criteria <br />are as follows: 1) pedestrian volume, 2) level of existing <br />development and business activities, 3) linkage of adjacent <br />community facilities and activities, 4) level of property <br />owner and/or tenant interest and commitment~ The recommended <br />priorities are as follows: 1) Fourth Street, N.B. between <br />Main and Market Streets, 2) Fifth Street~ S.Z. between Main <br />and Water Streets, 3) Fifth Street, N.Z. between Main and <br />Market Streets, 4) Second Street, N.Z. between the Central <br />Place and Market Streets, 5) Second Street, S.Z. between <br />Main and Water Streets, and 6) Second Stree.t, N.W. between <br />Main and Market Streets. Mr. Huja estimated the City's <br />cost for bricking 5th Street at $25,C00 to $30,000. <br /> <br /> Mr. Barnes asked why Mr. Sours and Mr. Snook voted <br />against the Planning Commission recommendations. <br /> <br /> Mr. Huja replied that Mr. Sours and Mr. Snook felt <br />there were other projects that were higher priorities in <br />the City. <br /> <br /> Dr. Hall made a motion to approve bricking of 4th <br />Street, N.E. The motion died for lack of a second. <br /> <br /> Mr. Buck made a motio~n to approve bricking 5th Street, <br />S~Z. down to the alley because the developer was willing <br />to pay for half of the cost. Mrs. Gleason seconded the <br />motion. <br /> <br /> Mr. Barnes stated that he would vote against the <br />motion because while he felt it was a good deal for the <br />City, in these economic times, the money should be held <br />for more important purposes. <br /> <br /> Council approved the bricking of Sth Street from the <br />downtown mall to the alley, with the City supplying the <br />materials and the developer of the property on Sth and <br />the mall, Dr. Charles Hurt, supplying the labor, by the <br />following vote. Ayes: Mr. Buck, Mrs. Gleason, Dr. Gunter, <br />Dr. Hall. Noes: Mr. Barnes. <br /> <br />APPROPRIATION: FY 84-85 CLOSZ-OUT APPROPRIATIONS <br /> <br /> Mr. Gary O'Connell, Deputy City Manager, stated that <br />the appropriation contained mostly housekeeping items which <br />would adjust.the accounts to match the correct financial <br />report. <br /> <br /> <br />