My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1982-09-07
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1982
>
1982-09-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2003 6:11:12 PM
Creation date
1/8/2003 6:01:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
9/7/1982
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STAFF REPORT: <br />CENTRAL PLACE <br />DEVELOPMENT <br /> <br />STAFF REPORT: <br />PART-TIME <br />POSITION - <br />FINANCE <br />DEPARTMENT <br /> <br />STAFF REPORT: <br />RECREATION FEE <br />BASED REVENUES <br /> <br />Mr. Fife to develop a more specific charge. Dr. Gunter seconded the motion <br />and Council agreed by the following vote. Ayes: Mr. Buck, Mr. Conover, <br />Mrs. Gleason, Dr. Gunter. Noes: None. Absent: Dr. Hall. <br /> Mr. F. Alton Garrett, Chairman of the Charlottesville Development <br />Group, made a presentation to Council, indicating the Charlottesville <br />Development Group's recommendation to Council to seek out developers for <br />the Central Place. <br /> <br /> Mr. Garrett submitted a request for proposal'for Council's approval. <br /> He indicated that the intent of the request is to generate more activity <br /> for the Central Place. He stated that he would recommend Council encourage <br /> more emphasis on financial ability of designers and that alternative <br /> proposals that do not rigidly adhere to the criteria also be entertained. <br /> <br /> On motion by Mrs. Gleason, seconded by Dr. Gunter, Council voted to <br /> accept the recommendation of the Charlottesville Development Group to <br /> solicit proposals for the development of the Central Place using the format <br /> as designed by the staff and endorsed by the Development Group by the <br /> following vote. Ayes: Mr. Buck, Mr. Conover, Mrs. Gleason, Dr. Gunter. <br /> Noes: None. Absent: Dr. Hall. <br /> <br /> Cole Hendrix, City Manager, outlined a memo received by Council, <br /> recommending the authorization of the employment of a part-time Clerk II <br /> for the Finance Department to be funded by the present $4,400 overtime <br /> budget. Mr. Hendrix stated that presently the current Accounts Payable <br /> Clerk, who is an Account Clerk I[I at the top of her pay range ($12.033 <br /> per overtime hour), is being paid to handle the overtime workload. He <br /> stated that this results in an additional 366 paid overtime hours to <br /> maintain the accounts payable schedule. He continued, saying that this <br /> is an expensive way to handle the overtime workload. Due to the proposed <br /> part~time position being at a lesser rate ($4.24 per hour), the staff <br /> believes the current workload can be more effectively handled as compared <br /> to the current overtime costs being incurred. <br /> <br /> On motion by Dr. Gunter, seconded by Mrs. Gleason, Council voted to <br /> approve the creation of a part-time Clerk III position in the Finance <br /> Department by the following vote. Ayes: Mr. Buck, Mr. Conover, Mrs. <br /> Gleason, Dr. Gunter. Noes: None. Absent: Dr. Hall. <br /> <br /> Mr. Hendrix presented a report to Council recommending the establish- <br /> ment of a revolving fund for the excess fee-based revenues received by <br /> the Department of Parks and Recreation. Mr. Hendrix explained that the <br /> Parks and Recreation Department conducts several programs that are <br /> supported totally from fees and charges, and in addition produces a <br /> small amount of revenue for the General Fund. He stated that the budget <br /> for the fee-based programs is not included with the regular oCerating <br /> budget of the Parks and Recreation Department, with the fee program <br /> revenues being accounted for separately. He continued, saying that during <br /> the past several years, the excess fee-based revenues have become a part <br /> of the General Fund, creating a problem whereas equipment for the fee- <br /> based programs is in need of replacement, and was not budgeted in the <br /> General Fund. Mr. Hendrix stated that the revolving fund concept would <br /> mean that the fees from these programs would cover all operational costs <br /> associated with these programs and that excess funds would be used for <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.