Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF REPORT: <br />CENTEL RATE <br />CASE <br /> <br />APPROPRIATION: <br />$4,453 LITTER <br />CONTROL GRANT <br />(2nd reading) <br /> <br />APPROPRIATION: <br />$16,800 LAW <br />ENFORCEMENT <br />CONSOLIDATION <br />STUDY <br />(2nd reading) <br /> <br /> recommends employing a full-time Clerk I to be responsible for the operation <br /> of the copy center in City Hall. <br /> <br /> On motion by Dr. Hall, seconded' by Dr. Gunter, Council agreed to follow <br /> the staff's recommendation by the following vote. A~es: Mr. Buck, Mr. <br /> Conover, Dr. Gunter, Dr. Hail. Noes: None. Absent: Mrs. Gleason. <br /> <br /> Roger Wiley, City Attorney, informed Council that as of September, <br /> 1982, Centel has filed a request with the State Corporation Commission to <br /> increase its rates to a 5.7'% surcharge on all local service as of October <br /> 1st and as of January 1, 1983 an increase to a total of 13.59%. Mr. Wiley <br /> stated that the.increase comes from the change in allowable depreciation <br /> rates and from Centel's request to be able to charge customers with the <br /> cost of taking out of service prematurely the University's Centrex. He <br /> explained that the University has a new system which was purchased from <br /> a vendor other than Centel, resulting in the retirement of the Centrex <br /> system before the full cost was advertised. Mr. Wiley continued, stating <br /> that this issue was raised in 1981 and the Commission postponed decising <br /> until the University's system conversion, which occurred during the summer <br /> of 1982. He stated that last week the State Corporation Commission put <br /> part of the 5.7% increase into effect subject to later refunds and then <br /> <br /> scheduled hearings toward the end of the year on the other questions. He <br /> <br /> stated that Council has requested he talk with the attorneys that had <br /> <br /> represented the City in the 1981 case to obtain an estimate of the costs <br /> for representation in this matter. Mr. Wiley estimated the costs at under <br /> $5,000. Mr. Wiley recommended Council retain the same firm to represent <br /> the City. <br /> <br /> Dr. Gunter stated that the money spent last year for the Centel rate <br /> case was a successful venture and motioned that Council accept Mr. Wiley's <br /> recommendation and obtain the firm for the current Centel rate case. Dr. <br /> Hall seconded the motion, and Council approved the motion as follows. Ayes: <br /> Mr. Buck, Mr. Conover, Dr. Gunter, Dr. Hall. Noes: None. Absent: Mrs. <br /> Gleason. <br /> <br /> The appropriation of $4,453 for a litter control grant which was <br />offered at the meeting of September 7th was adopted by the following vote. <br />Ayes: Mr. Buck, Mr. Conover, Dr. Gunter, Dr. Hall. Noes: None. Absent: <br />Mrs. Gleason. <br /> <br /> Council agreed to discuss agenda item 16, a committee report from the <br />Consolidation Study Committee, since the two are related. <br /> <br /> Mr. Conover, also a member of the Committee, highlighted the report. <br /> (Copy of the Report will be kept on file wiih the minutes.) <br /> <br /> The Committee's recommendation is to begin studies in the areas of <br /> <br />law 'enforcement, social services, inspections and education. Mr. Conover <br />also recommended that the Committee continue to exist to monitor the <br />studies and maintain progress reports. <br /> <br /> Dr. Gunter commended Mr. Conover and Mrs. Gleason for the well written <br />report and for their representation on the Committee. <br /> <br /> Dr. Hall spoke in support of Dr. Gunter's statement. <br /> <br /> On motion by Mr. Conover, seconded by Dr. Gunter, the preliminary report <br />from the Consolidation Study-Committee was approved by the following vote. <br />Ayes: Mr. Buck, Mr. Conover, Dr. Gunter, Dr. Hall. Noes: None. Absent: <br /> <br />Mrs. Gleason. <br /> <br /> <br />