ORDINANCE:
<br />REZONING LAND
<br />LOCATED IN
<br />SEMINOLE SQUARE
<br />(2nd reading)
<br />
<br />ORDINANCE:
<br />REZONING LAND
<br />LOCATED ON
<br />SYCAMORE STREET
<br />AND ST. CHARLES
<br />AVENUE
<br />(2nd reading)
<br />
<br />ORDINANCE:
<br />AMENDMENTS TO
<br />ZONING
<br />ORDINANCE
<br />
<br />and incorporated by reference, and
<br />
<br /> WHEREAS, by said Resolution dated January 1S, 1968 the Council of
<br />the City of Charlottesville did reserve for the City the right to lay,
<br />maintain, repair and operate its utility lines which are now or may be
<br />installed in said area herein closed and vacated (emphasis suppli-~),
<br />and
<br />
<br /> WHEREAS, the City Public Works Department has indicated that it has
<br />no intention nor any need to install any new utility lines which are not
<br />now in existence, and
<br />
<br /> WHEREAS, the property owner owning abutting property to the above-
<br />described closed streets wishes to develop said property with the assurance
<br />that no further utility lines will be installed, and
<br />
<br /> WHEREAS, the Council of the Ci.ty Of Charlottesville is willing to
<br />delete the language underscored above, "or may be installed," from its'
<br />Resolution adopted January 15, 1968,
<br />
<br /> NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Council of the City of
<br />Charlottesville, that its Resolution dated January iS, 1968, closing
<br />portions of Sonoma Street, Stonehenge Avenue, and ~he alley between
<br />Monticello and Stonehenge Avenue, reserving unto the City the right
<br />to lay, maintain, repazr and operate its utility lines which are now
<br />in existence be and is hereby amended to delete the language "or may
<br />be installed;" so that the Resolution of January IS, 1968 will read in
<br />pertinent part,
<br />
<br />and that this vacation shall not extinguish existing
<br />utility line easements for telephone, electric and
<br />T.V. cable lines in the area herein closed and vacated;
<br />and provided further that the City retain and reserve
<br />to itself the right to lay, maintain, repair and
<br />operate its utility lines which are now in existence in
<br />said area herein closed and vacated.
<br />
<br /> BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of the Council be and is
<br />hereby directed to record this Resolution and sketch in the Clerk's Office
<br />of the Circuit Court in the City of Charlottesville.
<br />
<br />The ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING THE
<br />
<br />DISTRICT MAP INCORPORATED IN SECTION 31-4 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF
<br />
<br />THE CODE OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE BY THE REZONING OF A PARCEL OF
<br />
<br />LAND LOCATED IN SEMINOLE SQUARE" which was offered at the meeting of
<br />
<br />October 4th was adopted by the following vote. Ayes: Mr. Buck, Mr. Conover,
<br />
<br />Mrs. Gleason, Dr. Gunter, Dr. Hall. Noes: None.
<br />
<br /> The ordinance entitled AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND REENACTING THE DISTRICT
<br />
<br />MAP INCORPORATED IN SECTION 31-4 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CODE OF THE
<br />
<br />CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE BY THE REZO
<br />SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SYCAMORE STREET
<br />offered at the meeting of October
<br />Ayes: Mr. Buck, Mr. Conover, Mrs.
<br />
<br /> Mr. Wiley explained that thes
<br />the Planning Commission at a publi
<br />involved are non-controversial item
<br />Planning Commission did not recomm{
<br />presented at that hearing.
<br />
<br /> Mr. Conover commented on the
<br />He stated that he would like to see
<br />by the Planning Commission or Counc
<br />
<br /> Dr. Gunter made reference to
<br />notice to be given prior to zoning
<br />change would only require a first
<br />
<br /> NING OF A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED ON THE
<br />
<br /> AND ST. CHARLES AVENUE" which was
<br />
<br />4th was adopted by the following vote.
<br />
<br /> Sleason, Dr. Gunter, Dr. Hall. Noes:
<br />
<br />e zoning ordinances had been discussed by
<br />
<br />c hearing. He stated that the ordinances
<br /> s. He stated that essentially, the
<br /> nd adoption of the controversial ordinances
<br />
<br />None.
<br />
<br /> ~ction pertaining to amusement arcades.
<br />
<br /> a more flexible zoning ordinance regulated
<br /> il.
<br />
<br />Section 31-273, pertaining to a written
<br />
<br /> classification changes. The proposed
<br />
<br />class mail notification instead of registered
<br />
<br />or certified mail. Dr. Gunter stated that some of the neighborhood associations
<br />had been in contact with her and planned to oppose the change.
<br />
<br />On motion by Mrs. Gleason, seconded by Mr. Conover, an ordinance entitled
<br />
<br />"AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN SECTIONS 31-3, 31-33, 31-34, 31-85, 31-86,
<br />31-93, 31-107, 31-217.2, 31-132, 31-133, S1-136, 31-132' 31-134, 31-180, 31-193,
<br />
<br />
<br />
|