Laserfiche WebLink
226 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION: <br />MEMBERSHIP OF <br />SOCIAL DEVELOP- <br />MENT COMMISSION <br /> <br />ORDINANCE: <br />UTILITY RATE <br />INCREASE <br />(2nd reading) <br /> <br />this community; and <br /> WHEREAS, the proposed facility would represent an eventual <br />investment of hundreds of millions of dollars, would provide <br />needed 6mployment during its construction and in over 250 permanent <br />jobs, would bring many other people to visit Charlottesville, and <br />would help in attracting other business and research activities to <br />the area, all having substantial benefits for the economy of the <br />area; now, therefore be it <br /> RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Charlotte~vil!e, Virginia, <br />that the Council warmly endorses the efforts to bring the National <br />Electron Accelerator Laboratory to Charlottesville, respectfully <br />urges the federal officials and other responsible to approve the <br />location of the project in this community, and offers its support and <br />assistance in making this beneficial project a reality; and be it <br />further <br /> RESOLVED that the Clerk of the Council is-directed to send <br /> certified copies of this resolution to the Secretary of Energy, <br /> to the members of Congress representing Charlottesville, to the <br /> president of the University of Virginia and to Professor James <br /> S. McCarthy, Acting Director of the National Electron Accelerator <br /> Laboratory. <br /> <br /> Mr. Huja stated that the Social Development Commission had <br /> discussed the issue of vacancies and analyzed the types of members <br /> on the Commission and those who attended regularly. He encouraged the <br /> changes in order to allow more flexibility for membership. <br /> <br /> Dr. Gunter moved, Mrs. Gleason seconded, and the resolution was <br /> <br />unanimously aproved as amended: <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, this Council has previously adopted a resolution <br />establishing a procedure for the selection of persons to be <br />appointed to the Social Development Commission and has amended <br />that resolution from time to time; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the Council now desires further to amend that <br />policy.; <br /> <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City <br />of Charlottesville that the following statement, as amended, is <br />hereby adopted as the policy of the Council with regard to the <br />appointment of members of the Social Development Commission: <br /> The Council shall strive to appoint members to the commission <br />who have a strong interest in and~knowledge of social concerns. <br />The members shall be available to attend regular meetings as <br />well as to work on special projects. The Council shall appoint <br />eleven members and strive to balance the commission in terms of <br />geography, race, income, age and sex. <br /> <br /> Of the eleven members four shall be appointed from the <br /> following special categories: <br /> <br /> (a) One member of the City School Board or person <br /> designated by the board. <br /> (b) One member of the University of Virginia faculty <br /> or administration. <br /> (c) One low-income resident of the City. <br /> (d) One member of the City Planning Commission. <br /> <br /> The remaining seven persons appointed to the commission shall <br /> be members of or have interest in one or more of the following <br /> groups: <br /> <br />(a) City churches. <br />(h) Youth. <br />(c) Persons 60 years of age or older. <br />(d) Voluntary service organizations. <br />(e) Social service agencies. <br />(f) Business or business organizations. <br />(g) Persons experienced in dealing with concerns of <br /> health, employment, safety and justice, culture <br /> and commnnications, or handicapped persons. <br />(h) Collpge or university student. <br /> <br /> It shall be the policy of the Council to permit existing members <br />of the commission to continue to serve until the end of their terms <br />and to replace such present members with persons from the foregoing <br />categories as vacancies arise. <br /> <br />Mrs. Gleason questioned the wording in (b) of page one concerning <br /> <br />separate metering and moved that the ordinance be' amended to delete the <br /> <br />phrase. Dr. Hall seconded, and the move to amend was unanimously approved. <br /> <br />Mr. Conover moved to amend the surcharge for county customers. He <br /> <br />said the county did have a 10% surcharge on their gas bills, but there <br /> <br /> <br />