My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1983-08-01
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1983
>
1983-08-01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2004 2:52:53 PM
Creation date
8/26/2003 5:05:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
8/1/1983
Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PRESENTATION: <br />PEDESTRIAN <br />STUDY <br /> <br />PRESENTATION: <br />BOBBY BANKS <br /> <br />APPROPRIATION: <br />$18,000 <br />SUMMER NUTRITION <br />PROGRA~ <br />(2nd: reading) <br /> <br />Directo~ of Public Works '~'~'?~ ' <br /> , concurs with the Planning Commission recommen- <br />dations. <br /> <br />253 <br /> <br /> Mr. Mart'in presented the Pedestrian'Study which included emphasis <br />on the following: sidewalks, crosswalks, railroad crossings, needs of <br />the handicapped, street lighting, pedestrian signals,~ and pedestrian <br />education. <br /> <br /> On a question by Mr. Buck, Mr. Martin responded~that a public hearing <br />~had been held by the Planning'Commission and the criteria for decision <br />making had been discussed. <br /> <br /> Dr. Gunter questioned the ordinance regarding pedestrian crosswalks <br />and Mr. Wiley responded that the wording may need to be changed in order <br />to better enforce ~the: law. ~' <br /> <br /> Mr. Buck suggested <br /> September 12th, after az <br /> <br /> Mr. Hendrix stated <br /> considered if a drainag~ <br /> a piecemeal versus a con <br /> be'discussed. Mr. Hendr <br /> estimate 'for the project <br /> <br /> Mr. Bobby Banks, Di: <br /> <br />Athletic. League, present{ <br /> n Carver Re~creation ~en~ <br />$1,000 be se~ aside f~r <br />monthly fees: $3 for :Ci~ <br />adults, and $2 for no~-Cj <br />to the Parks~ and Recrelat <br /> <br /> stated that h <br /> Banks said th <br /> fessional box <br /> charged an ad, <br /> <br /> Mr. Hend: <br />boxing progrm <br />be designed f{ <br />Mr. Hendrix ~{ <br />Mr. Banks wou] <br />Hendrix furth~ <br />where the Cit <br /> <br /> Mr. BUck <br />operated as or <br />suggested usi~ <br />for equipment <br /> <br />e and one o <br />at the <br />~rs to pa <br />titional <br />:ix state <br />~, but sa <br />~r youths <br />[ded that <br />.d have n~ <br />,r stated <br /> <br /> provide~ <br />agreed tt <br />tlined, <br />g the co <br /> <br /> He stal <br /> <br />a year and ad. ed that slhor <br />Of the professional boxers <br /> <br /> Mrs. Gleason moved tc <br /> <br />by Mr. Buck, w~th the u~d¢ <br />program. Dr.~ nGu ter s.econ <br />by Council. <br /> The $18,000 approp~ia <br />offered at the July 18th mt <br /> <br />that a second public hearing be held on <br />zertising the sidewalk priorities. <br />that long-term bond financing would need to be <br />study was desired. He added that the issue of <br />~rehensive approach to the. drainage problem should <br />.x said that staff would develop a time and cost <br /> <br />'ector and Head Counselor of the Charlo.ttesville <br />d a proposal fo.r continued use 'of two classrooms <br />er by his boxing program.~ Mr. Banks asked that <br />ew equipment and proposed charging the following <br />y adults, $1 for City youths, $6 for non-City <br />ty youths. He sugges.ted these fees be returned <br />on account to reple'nish equipment. Mr. Banks <br />her person would work on a volunteer basis. Mr. <br /> <br /> was not designed for, but would allow oro- <br /> <br /> , with .the understanding that they would be <br /> <br />~at the staff had not reported on a City-operated <br />.e assumed that if one. was developed, it would <br />;hout the emphasis on becoming professional boxers. <br /> <br /> the City did begin to operate a boxing program, <br />.cility in which to operate his program. Mr. <br /> <br />.t there are other, programs operating in the City <br />.e facility and volunteers serve as staff. <br />the program fulfilled a need and should be <br /> <br /> the current record-keeping maintained. Mr. Buck <br />ted fees to fund trips for youths and the $1,000 <br />he felt the program shoUld be re-evaluated after <br /> <br />Id the program exclude youth involvement in favor <br /> then he would be in favor of its termination. <br /> accept the proposal with the conditions suggested <br /> rstanding that the City would supervise the overall <br /> ied the motion, and it was unanimously approved <br /> <br />tion for the Summer .Nutrition Program which was <br /> <br />~eting, was approved by the following vote: Ayes: <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.