Laserfiche WebLink
443 <br /> <br />Ordinance re: <br />Amending Article II, <br />Chapter 4, relating <br />to dog license taxes <br />(2nd reading) <br /> <br />Ordinance re: <br />Amending Section '8-2 <br />relating to precinct <br />name changes <br />(2nd reading) <br /> <br />Ordinance re: <br />Amending Section <br />16-43.2 relating to <br />handicapped parking <br />spaces <br /> <br />Ordinance re: <br />Amending Chapter 6 <br />relating to cemetery <br />fees <br /> <br />Ordinance re: <br />Amending Chapter 10 <br />relating to tax <br />exemptions fOr <br />rehabilitated <br />property <br /> <br /> The ordinance entitled UAN .ORDINANCE TOAMEND AND <br />REORDAIN ARTICLE II OF CHAPTER 4 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF <br />CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA, 1976,~ ASAMENDED, BY AMENDING <br />SECTION 4,16 TO INCREASE DOG LICENSE TAXES AND TO ADD AN <br />EXCEPTION TO THE LICENSE REQUIREMENT FOR HEARING DOGS," <br />which was offered at the meeting of May 4, was adopted by <br />the following vote. Ayes~ Mr. Albro, Mr. Buck, Mr. Conover, <br /> <br /> Ms. Gleason <br /> <br /> The or~ <br /> SECTION 8-2 <br /> VIRGINIA, 19 <br /> AND THE UNI <br /> of May 4 was <br /> Mr. Buck, Mr <br /> <br /> On <br /> ordinance en <br /> SECTION 16-Z <br /> 1976, <br /> CAP~ED!' was <br /> cons <br /> <br /> On moti, <br />ordinance <br />6 OF THE <br />AS AMENDED, <br />was offered <br />Ms. Gleason <br />agreed <br />buried in a <br />problems bec~ <br />the grave. <br />the choice oJ <br /> <br /> Dr, Hall. Noes: None, <br /> <br />inance entitled ',AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN <br />DF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, <br /> <br />76, TO CHANGE THE NAME OF THE JOHNSON PRECINCT <br /> <br /> which was offered at the meeting <br /> ~ted by the following.~.~ote. Ayes: Mr. Albro, <br /> <br /> , Ms.. Gleason, Dr. Hall. Noes: None. <br /> <br /> Mr. Albro, seconded by Dr. Hall, an <br /> <br /> "ANORDINANCE TO AFiENDAND REORDAIN <br /> <br /> OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, <br /> PARKING INSPACEsRESERVED FOR THE HANDI- <br /> <br /> and ca~ried over to the next meeting for <br /> <br /> THE CITY <br /> <br /> SE <br /> carried ov <br /> <br /> about <br /> <br />:oncrete box <br /> <br />~use otherwise <br /> <br />~. Conover sa <br /> <br />~ buried in a <br /> <br /> and was not convinced that <br /> He said he would vote aga~ <br /> <br /> Council considered on <br />"AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND <br />THE CITY .OF~CHARLOTTESVILL] <br />ADDING ARTICLE XV, CONTAIN <br />THROUGH 10~100,. THE ADDED <br />PARTIAL PROPERTY TAX EXEMP~ <br />RESIDENTIAL~ COMPIERC~~I <br />Stripling, Assistant City.~ <br />proposed ordinance, saying <br />~o be a relatively insigniJ <br />rehabilitate proPerty, and t <br />to support his. recommendati <br />symbolic value in the or'di~ <br />Council's perceived willing <br />within the City, but he doe <br /> <br />Mr. Albro, seconded by Mr. Conover, an <br /> <br /> "AN ORDINANCE TO. AMEND AND REORDAIN CHAPTER <br /> DF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA, 1976, <br /> STION 6-9~TO INCREASE CEMETERY FEES" <br /> er to the next meeting for consideration. <br /> <br /> the cost-of burial of urns and staff <br /> <br /> Mr. Conover asked why one must be <br /> <br /> ~d wastotd it prevented maintenance <br /> <br /> the groUndwould eventually sink over <br /> [d he objected to people not having <br /> ~ooden box with no concrete enclosure <br /> <br /> it presented such a maintenance problem. <br /> ~st the ordinance for this reason. <br /> <br /> first reading an ordinance entitled <br /> REORDAIN CHAPTER 10 OF THE CODE OF <br /> · VIRGINIA,-1976, AS AMENDED, BY <br /> NG SECTIONS NUMBERED 10-90 <br /> <br /> ~TICLE AND SECTIONS PERTAINING TO <br /> <br /> 7IONS FOR CERTAIN REHABILITATED <br /> <br /> INDUSTRIAL PROPERTYV" Mr. Bob <br /> <br /> ~nager,. recommended against the <br /> that he considered tax exemptions <br /> icant factor in any decision to <br /> resented a report with an analysis <br /> on. He said there might be some <br /> ~nce in that it might enhance City <br /> ness to support economic development <br /> sn't consider this to be worth the <br /> <br /> <br />