Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br />opportunity to get the word out to its members. Mr. Phillips asked if the proposed study <br />is broad enough and long range enough and if it is needed at all. Mr. Phillips said <br />Council should be s ure the study does not create a paralysis of analysis and asked for a <br />two week delay. <br /> <br /> Ms. Deborah Murray, 731 Lexington Avenue and an attorney with the Southern <br />Environmental Law Center, said it is time to pass a resolution and said grade separated <br />inter changes are the key to traffic resolution. <br /> <br /> Mr. Milton Moore, 106 Falcon Drive, supported the resolution and said that the <br />original Three Party Agreement included the three interchanges. <br /> <br /> Mr. Howell Hepner of Holiday Inn Partners on Emmet Street, said he hopes that <br />all the intersections will be studied. <br /> <br /> Mr. Jeff Werner, Piedmont Environmental Council, supported examining the <br />traffic on Route 29 again and said that the Rt. 29 and Hydraulic intersection will be <br />gridlock in a few years. Mr. Werner said he finds it frustrating that we are bowing to the <br />business community. <br /> <br /> Mr. Theory Carey, Pavilion 6, East Lawn, questioned why the business <br />community is not pleading to have overpasses put in. Mr. Carey said he anticipates <br />positive benefits from the study. <br /> <br /> Mr. Henry Weinschenk, owner of Express Car Wash, said that people who oppose <br />the western bypass want it in "your city." Mr. Weinschenk said the resolution is really <br />one to relocate the bypass to the Rt. 29 corridor. He said that the business community <br />cannot commit to endorsing the resolution, but would like to be involved in the study. <br /> <br /> Ms. Katherine McCue, City resident, expressed support for moving forward with <br />the resolution. <br /> <br /> As there were no further speakers, the public hearing was closed. <br /> <br /> Mr . Cox said that Council has two items for consideration, the resolution for the <br />funding request and scope of study. Mr. Cox said the study will look at no build and at <br />grade interchanges in addition to grade separated interchanges, and will look at <br />improv ements in a regional context. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lynch said he is in favor of moving forward with the study and rescinding the <br />1995 resolution. Mr. Lynch noted that the issue has been on the table for two months <br />now and we need to get funding in place and get a fresh look at what is going to happen <br />in the Rt. 29 corridor. Mr. Lynch said he will not do anything that will damage the <br />economic community in Charlottesville. <br /> <br /> Mr. Schilling said he is still reading the latest version of the resolution. <br /> <br /> Ms. Richards said she is confused by some of the changes in the latest version of <br />the resolution, and while she is committed to moving forward with the study and <br />rescinding the 1995 resolution, she is concerned that Council has not had an opportunity <br />to fully vet, nor has the business community. Ms. Richards said she thinks Council <br />would benefit from additional input from the community. <br /> <br /> Mr. Cox asked if the scope of work has been significantly altered, and Mr. Tolbert <br />said the intent of the scope is essentially the same as proposed by the MPO Technical <br />Committee, but the study area has grown. <br /> <br /> Ms. Richards suggested that the MPO Policy Committee be asked to adopt the <br />changes at their October meeting. <br /> <br />