1996-06-17 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

108 //12 does not provide enough space to meet National Standards with 4' bike lanes. Ms. Mueller said that the travel lanes would be made as wide as possible because of concerns by the Fire, Police, and Rescue Squad about congestion when the turning lanes are eliminated. Mueller also noted that 150 bus trips are made daily on West Main Street. Ms. Mueller noted that comments had been previously made that loading would be allowed in bike lanes, but she said that she feels the City Attorney and Police should discuss this issue. Once a decision is made; Ms. Mueller recommended that the stripping be done after substantial completion of the new bridge and subsequent construction. Ms. Daugherty expressed concern that parking spaces are not proposed beyond 9th and 10th Street and the bus stop and loading zones appear to be abnormally long. Ms. Mueller said she will have stafflook into the area to see if it is possible to add more parking spaces. Ms. Mueller proposed to either paint the lanes or use a tape that will last a year. Mr. O'Connell recommended evaluating the bike lanes after a year to see how they are working and if they are achieving the desired goal, Mr. Toscano noted concern expressed by the Fire Department, Police Department and Rescue Squad about eliminating the turn lanes. Mr. O'Connell said the area will be more congested if turn lanes are eliminated, and emergency vehicles will be slowed down. Rev. Edwards said he feels the increased congestion will make it more dangerous for bike lanes as the street is not designed in a way to allow separate bike lanes. Rev. Edwards said he would prefer to have shared lanes. Rev. Edwards also expressed concern about slowing of emergency vehicles. Mr. Vandever said he does not think emergency vehicles will be significantly impacted since the original width of the street will remain and will be available for cars to pull over. Rev. Edwards made a motion to approve alternative gl0 and Mr. Toscano seconded the motion. Rev. Edwards said alternative gl0 would not have as much impact on the businesses, would provide a travel loop, and would give the City an opportunity to assess the situation. Mr. Toscano said he supports gl0 on the theory that it is better to try something and see the impact. Mr. Toscano expressed concern about the congestion, noting that additional development will be occurring on West Main Street and the impact of adding congestion is not known. Mr. Toscano also expressed concern about the City's liability. The motion was defeated by the following vote. Ayes: Rev. Edwards and Mr. Toscano. Noes: Ms. Daugherty, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Vandever. Ms. Daugherty made a motion to approve alternative #12. Ms. Slaughter seconded the motion, adding an amendment to endorse the Planning Commission's proposal of 8A and asking that the parking spaces available in #12 be fine tuned. Ms. Daugherty accepted the amendment to her motion. Ms. Daugherty said she thinks the bike lanes are a good idea, will be safer for bikers, and #12 is a more realistic solution as it retains most of the on-street parking. Ms. Daugherty stressed that she hopes more parking can be found at the west end of the route. Ms. Slaughter said she thinks the bike lanes will increase pedestrian and other forms of travel on West Main Street. Ms. Slaughter said she feels a four-foot bike lane is safe, and agreed with Mr. Vandever that the same amount of pavement will be available for emergency vehicles. Ms. Slaughter said she feels Council still needs to address the issue of