1995-07-17 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

202 Strategies," and including a city-wide land use plan map dated July 3, 1995 as presented by the Department of Community Development and approved by the Planning Commission to be printed as an insert to such document, are hereby adopted as the official Comprehensive Plan of the City, pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 11 (Section 15.1-446.1~ et seq.) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. Such sections shall have the full force and effect conferred upon comprehensive plans by such article and other provisions of general law. (2) The remaining sections of such document shall not be deemed to be part of the official Comprehensive Plan of the City, but shall be considered as supplemental statements of background data, existing and anticipated future conditions and policy considerations for general reference by t he Cit_¥ Council, City administration, boards, conu~ssions and agencies in planning and making decisions affecting those matters which are the subiect of such supplemental statements. ORDINANCE: 3RD STREET MALL IMPRO¥~MENTS ASSESSMENTS Mr. O'Connell explained that the ordinance would impose final assessments on property owners for the 3rd Street/Mall improvements done in partnership between the City and adiacent property owners. The property, owners will be given up to ten years to pay the assessment. Mr. Toscano asked if there were any comments from the public but there were none. On motion by Ms. Slaughter, seconded by Mr. Vandever, the ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE AFFIRMING THE CREATION OF A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURSUANT TO VIRGINIA CODE SECTIONS 15.1-239, et. seq., ESTABLISHING THE PORTION OF PROJECT COSTS TO BE LE¥2ED AS AN ASSESSMENT ON THE PROPERTIES IN SUCH DISTRICT; RECITING THE FINDINGS OF CITY COUNCIL IN REGARD TO TI~ BENEFITS ACCRUING TO PROPERTIES WITHIN SAID DISTRICT; ESTABLiSHiNG THE AMOUNT OF THE ASSESSMENT TO BE LEVIED ON EACH SUCH PROPERTY; LEVX~ t~NG SAID ASSESSMENTS AND PROVIDING FOR THE Ti2dE, MANNER AND TERMS OF THE COLLECTION THEKEOF'~ was offered and carried over to the next meeting for consideration. PUBLIC Col. William L. Spicuzza, co-owner of FoodWorks at 1 t4 4th Street, N.E.~ stated that he has received notice to remove a sign advertising the business and doing so has resulted in a 33% decline in business since the sign was removed. Mr. Spicuzza asked that the locator map on the downtown mall be updated~ that signs be allowed by permit, and that a 60-day moratorium on the removal of the signs be approved b5~ Council, subject to a City-approved sign on the mall by permit. Mr~ Toscano stated that he will take Mr. Spicuzza's suggestions into consideration and would like to hear staffs comments. Ms. Slaughter stated that she would like to see better locator signs on the mall. Ms. Elizabeth Herka, owner of the Cat House on 5th Street, S.E., expressed agreement with Mr. Spicuzza's suggestions, and noted that her business has dropped 40% since her sign has been removed. Ms. Daugherty expressed concern about the toss of business for the merchants at a time when tourists are being lured downtown and made a motion to impose a 60-day moratorium on the sign removal. Mr~ Vandever seconded the motion. Ms. Slaughter'spoke in opposition to the moratorium because she does not th_imk it is legal in Virginia to~imp6se;such a moratorium, and she thinks it is wrong not to enforce a