|
130
<br />
<br /> WHEREAS, it now appears that certain properties.on
<br />Highland Avenue may have been inadvertently or mistakenly
<br />omitted from the group of properties in the City which were
<br />classified as One Family Residential on the Land Use Plan and
<br />subsequently rezoned to an R-lA zoning classification; and
<br />
<br /> WHEREAS, on April 14, 1992, the City Council and the
<br />Planning Commission held a joint public hearing to consider
<br />whether these Highland Avenue properties shouldibe classified
<br />as One Family Residential on the Land Use Plan, and rezoned
<br />to R-lA Residential; and
<br />
<br /> WHEREAS, the properties immediately to the north and to
<br />the south of the aforementioned properties are designated as
<br />One Family Residential; and ·
<br />
<br /> WHEREAS, the parcels in question on Highland Avenue are
<br />an appropriate size for single family residential use, and
<br />the predominant use on this portion of Highland Avenue is
<br />single family residential; and
<br />
<br /> WHEREAS, the public necessity, convenience, general
<br />welfare and good zoning practice require a change in the Land
<br />Use Plan's classification of certain parcels on Highland
<br />Avenue, identified on City Real Estate Tax Map 21 as Parcels
<br />116, 117, 118, 119~ 120, 121, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131
<br />and the northern portion of 131.1, from Two Family
<br />Residential to One Family Residential;
<br />
<br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the
<br />City of Charlottesville that the Land Use Plan of the
<br />Comprehensive Plan is hereby amended to change the
<br />classification of those properties on Highland Avenue,
<br />identified on City Real Estate Tax Map 21 as Parcels 116,
<br />117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131 and the
<br />northern portion of 131.1, from Two Family Residential to One
<br />Family Residential.
<br />
<br />ORDINANCE: REZONING 13 PARCELS OF LAND ON HIGHLAND AVENUE FROM
<br />R-2 TO R-lA (2nd reading)
<br />
<br /> The ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND
<br />REENACTING THE DISTRICT ~AP INCORPORATED IN SECTION 34~15 OF
<br />THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF
<br />CHARLOTTESVILLE, 1990, AS AMENDED, BY THE REZONING OF
<br />PROPERTY LOCATED ON HIGHLAND AVENUE SHOWN ON CITY REAL
<br />PROPERTY TAX MAP 21 AS PARCELS 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121,
<br />126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, AND THE NORTHERN PORTION OF
<br />131.1," which was offered at the April 20th meeting, was
<br />approved by the following vote. Ayes: Rev. Edwards, Ms.
<br />Slaughter, Mr. Toscano, Mr. Vandever, Ms. Waters. Noes:
<br />None.
<br />
<br />PUBLIC
<br />
<br />There were no matters by the public.
<br />
<br />OTHER BUSINESS
<br />
<br /> Mr. Toscano gave an update on the West Main Street Task
<br />Force and explained that a tentative decision had been made to
<br />ask the University what they envision a residential college
<br />on West Main Street would look like, where it would be
<br />located, and what the role of the City be. Mr. Toscano
<br />stated that it was the sense of the Task Force that if a
<br />residential college were built on West Main, it would be
<br />privately developed and would remain on the tax roles. Mr.
<br />Toscano stated that subcommittees have been formed to study
<br />the following: train station; design guidelines; and
<br />possibilities for mixed commercial and residential uses.
<br />
<br /> Ms. Waters stated that she felt an injustice had been
<br />done in the Rodney King court case in California and felt the
<br />
<br />
<br />
|