My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998_Resolutions
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Ords Res App
>
Resolutions 1976-2009
>
1998_Resolutions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2024 4:14:27 PM
Creation date
3/30/2015 2:47:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Attorney
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
�.,�....R..R�......gtharoughly - - - - - signifieant <br />buildings, <br />- <br />through- _ <br />information should be retained by the Gity of Charlottesville Department of <br />and <br />.-_ Planning"Suggestions Section'l <br />Gemmunity Developmei-A and the Virginia <br />artment <br />3. if the site is to femaift vaeai-A for any, length aftime, maintain the empty lot in a manne <br />eensistent with other open spaee in the distriets. [Beyond enabling legislation and vague] <br />Review Criteria and Guidelines for Moving Historie Buildings Removing or Relocating <br />Protected Properties <br />1. The criteria for adding or removing properties from design control districts, as set forth in <br />Section 34-568(b) and 04-577(b) of the City Code, and set forth verbatim in the preceding <br />• section of this chapter beginning on page 2. <br />2. The public necessity of the proposed move. <br />U <br />3. The public purpose or interest in land or buildings to be protected. <br />3. The age and eharaeter of a historie strueture, its eandition, and its probable life expeetaner. <br />[Covered under City Code criteria] <br />4. The existing character of the setting of the structure or area and its surroundings. <br />5. Whether or not the proposed relocation would have a detrimental effect on the structural <br />soundness of the building. <br />6. Whether or not the proposed relocation would have a negative or positive effect on other sites <br />or structures within the historic district. <br />7. Whether or not the proposed relocation would provide new surroundings that would be <br />compatible with the architectural aspects of the structure. <br />Charlottesville Historic District Design Guidelines: Demolition and Moving 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.