My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998_Resolutions
Charlottesville
>
City Council
>
Ords Res App
>
Resolutions 1976-2009
>
1998_Resolutions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2024 4:14:27 PM
Creation date
3/30/2015 2:47:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Attorney
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(g) Whether the structure or any of its features represent an infrequent or the first or last <br />• remaining example of a particular detail or type of architecture in the city. <br />(h) Whether the structure is not capable of earning a reasonable economic return on its <br />value in light of its overall condition, potential uses and location. <br />(i) Whether the restoration and preservation of the property are not economically feasible <br />because the owner, without good cause, failed to properly maintain the property. <br />2. The public necessity of the proposed demolition. <br />3. The public purpose or interest in land or buildings to be protected. <br />r. <br />[These are covered by the City Code criteria] <br />4. The existing character of the setting of the structure or area and its surroundings. [Perhaps <br />duplicative of City Code criteria] <br />• [Covered by City Code criteria] <br />[Covered by City Code criteria] <br />5. Whether or not a relocation of the structure would be a practical and preferable alternative to <br />demolition. <br />6. Whether or not the proposed demolition eauld potentially would affect adversely or positively <br />other historic buildings or the character of the historic district. <br />7. The reason for demolishing the structure and whether or not viable alternatives exist. <br />8. Whether or not there has been a professional economic and structural feasibility study for <br />rehabilitating or reusing the structure and whether or not its findings support the proposed <br />demolition. [Perhaps covered by City Code criteria] <br />1. Demolish a historie streeture only afier all pref�rttble altettratives have been exhattsted. <br />[Duplicated by paragraph #7 above] <br />• <br />Charlottesville Historic District Design Guidelines: Demolition and Moving 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.