Laserfiche WebLink
231 <br /> <br />WORK SESSION: UTILITY RATES <br /> <br /> Ms. Rita Scott, Director of Finance, reviewed the proposed utility rates and major <br />capital costs, including replacement lines, gas feeder lines, automated meter reading (AMR) <br />and meter replacement. <br /> <br /> Responding to questions submitted by Councilors prior to the meeting, the following <br />information was provided by Ms. Scott and Ms. Judy Mueller, Director of Public Works. <br />There are 86 employees in the Utility Division and 17 in Utility Billing. Some Utility <br />employees do other non-utility functions, including snow removal, answering of emergency <br />calls, administration of the drug program, and overall Public Works Safety Training. No <br />General Fund dollars are used to compensate Utility employees. There are currently six <br />meter readers and if the City does not move toward automated meter reading, one additional <br />meter reader will need to be added; with AMR, the number of meter readers could be <br />reduced to two. An increase in revenue is projected for replacing water meters because these <br />meters slow down over time. It is expected to take a year to replace 8,500 water meters, <br />1,100 gas meters and to retrofit others with the AMR device. The Albemarle County Service <br />Authority is currently using a wand system for meter reading which requires that they pass <br />the wand over the meter. They are exploring the AMR system and it is possible for the City <br />to do something in conjunction with them. <br /> <br />The contract with the University of Virginia was discussed. <br /> <br /> Ms. Richards noted that costs are increasing, including capital costs, but the University <br />does not pay the same increases as other customers. Mr. Tom Haden, City Comptroller, <br />replied that the University maintains their own water lines and has their own central system. <br /> <br />Mr. Cox said there appears to be no incentive for the University to do water <br />conservation and he feels there is merit to opening a discussion with them on this issue. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mueller suggested that staff prepared a report on the contract with the University, <br />to include the history of the contract, implications of changing the contract, and options for <br />the future. <br /> <br /> The issue of water conservation was discussed and Mr. Leon Churchill, Assistant City <br />Manager, noted that line replacement may result in water conservation. <br /> <br /> The gas system was discussed. There are 200 new gas customers in the City due to <br />aggressive marketing in areas where there has been gas line replacement. Staff continues to <br />feel comfortable with the 10% rate of return for new gas customers and with the working <br />capital requirement of 60 days plus $1/2 million. Payment in lieu of taxes is calculated using <br />a formula of indirect cost allocation by function to utility and a percentage of estimated <br />revenues based on last year's use. Payments in lieu of taxes amounted to $2.2 million this <br />year from all funds. No increase in this amount is expected next year. <br /> <br /> Mr. Toscano said that he would like to ensure that City taxpayers get the benefit of any <br />surplus utility revenues, if generated <br /> <br /> Mr. Cox said he would like to explore generating funds from utilities for <br />undergrounding of utility lines. <br /> <br />ORDINANCE: UTILITY RATES (2nd reading) <br /> <br /> The ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND AND REORDAIN <br />SECTIONS 31-56, 31-57, 31-59, 31-60, 31-61, 31-62, 31-153, AND 31-156, OF THE <br />CODE OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, 1990, AS AdMENDED, RELATING TO <br />UTILITY RATES," which was offered at the June 1, was approved by the following vote. <br />Ayes: Mr. Cox, Ms. Daugherty, Ms. Richards, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Toscano. Noes: None. <br /> <br /> <br />